2021
DOI: 10.3390/ani11010175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torquenema n. g., Wallabicola n. g., and Macropostrongyloides phascolomys n. sp.: New Genera and a New Species of Nematode (Strongylida: Phascolostrongylinae) Parasitic in Australian Macropodid and Vombatid Marsupials

Abstract: The strongyloid nematodes belonging to the subfamily Phascolostrongylinae occur primarily in the large intestines of macropodid and vombatid marsupials. Current molecular evidence suggests that the two nematode species, Macropostrongyloides dissimilis and Paramacropostrongylus toraliformis, from macropodid marsupials are distant from their respective congeners. Furthermore, specimens of Macropostrongyloides lasiorhini from the large intestines of the southern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of both the current mitochondrial and previous ITS data sets placed Torquenema external to the clade comprising Macropostrongyloides , but with low branch support. Although Torquenema can be clearly distinguished from Macropostrongyloides by its occurrence in the stomach of its host and its prominent cervical collar, they share some common features, including a Y-shaped ovejector and small peri-oral denticles [ 10 , 35 ]. Mitochondrial and ITS data support the separation of Torquenema from its previous position within Paramacropostrongylus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of both the current mitochondrial and previous ITS data sets placed Torquenema external to the clade comprising Macropostrongyloides , but with low branch support. Although Torquenema can be clearly distinguished from Macropostrongyloides by its occurrence in the stomach of its host and its prominent cervical collar, they share some common features, including a Y-shaped ovejector and small peri-oral denticles [ 10 , 35 ]. Mitochondrial and ITS data support the separation of Torquenema from its previous position within Paramacropostrongylus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, two species ( Macropostrongyloides dissimilis and Paramacropostrongylus toraliformis ) were found to be divergent from their congeners using ITS markers [ 9 ]. Subsequently, morphological examination of these nematodes led to the description of two new genera, namely Wallabicola dissimilis (formerly M. dissimilis ) from the swamp wallaby, Wallabiocola bicolor and Torquenema toraliforme (formerly P. toraliformis ) from the eastern grey kangaroo Macropus giganteus [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these features, apart from the dorsal gutter, do not consistently differentiate the Cloacininae from the Phascolostrongylinae. For instance, Wallabicola dissimilis from the subfamily Phascolostrongylinae possesses a J-shaped ovejector [ 25 ], which is characteristic of the Cloacininae, whereas the remaining genera of the Phascolostrongylinae possess a Y-shaped ovejector, or a slight variation to it [ 2 ]. The externo-dorsal rays usually originate from the dorsal trunk in the Phascolostrongylinae and from the lateral trunk in the Cloacininae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, however, two species of Cloacina (Cloacininae) from the banded-hare wallaby, Lagostrophus fasciatus, in which the externo-dorsal ray arises from the dorsal ray [ 26 ]. Recently, Sukee et al [ 25 ] pointed out that the shape of the deirid is a reliable character for differentiating the Cloacininae from the Phascolostrongylinae since it is consistently elongate and setiform in the former compared to short and papillate in the latter. Although this feature could be considered taxonomically important and used in future, additional morphological features would facilitate the differentiation between the Cloacininae and the Phascolostrongylinae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%