2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14238143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torque Vectoring Control of RWID Electric Vehicle for Reducing Driving-Wheel Slippage Energy Dissipation in Cornering

Abstract: The anxiety of driving range and inconvenience of battery recharging has placed high requirements on the energy efficiency of electric vehicles. To reduce driving-wheel slip energy consumption while cornering, a torque vectoring control strategy for a rear-wheel independent-drive (RWID) electric vehicle is proposed. First, the longitudinal linear stiffness of each driving wheel is estimated by using the approach of recursive least squares. Then, an initial differential torque is calculated for reducing their o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are few rover or vehicle verification studies in this research field, particularly studies on regulating the wheel slip independently while maintaining a fixed orientation on slippery roads under high-speed conditions (during acceleration and deceleration) via dynamic FLCs. In order to further verify the proposed metaheuristic FLCs' effect, studies involving a reference estimation model [111], an adaptive fuzzy type-2 control mechanism [112], H ∞ with the Moore-Penrose theory [113], a torque distribution control [114], an electrical drive wheel speed using a machine learning approach [115], a longitudinal vehicle speed estimator based on fuzzy logic control [116], a torque vector control of a rear-wheel independent-drive (RWID) electric vehicle [117] and an anti-skid fuzzy PID control strategy for a four-wheel independent-drive electric vehicle (4WDIEV) [118] are selected to be compared and a validation simulation is carried out, except for [116], which is validated via both the simulation setup and hardware setup. A comprehensive performance comparison is shown in Table 12.…”
Section: Figure 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are few rover or vehicle verification studies in this research field, particularly studies on regulating the wheel slip independently while maintaining a fixed orientation on slippery roads under high-speed conditions (during acceleration and deceleration) via dynamic FLCs. In order to further verify the proposed metaheuristic FLCs' effect, studies involving a reference estimation model [111], an adaptive fuzzy type-2 control mechanism [112], H ∞ with the Moore-Penrose theory [113], a torque distribution control [114], an electrical drive wheel speed using a machine learning approach [115], a longitudinal vehicle speed estimator based on fuzzy logic control [116], a torque vector control of a rear-wheel independent-drive (RWID) electric vehicle [117] and an anti-skid fuzzy PID control strategy for a four-wheel independent-drive electric vehicle (4WDIEV) [118] are selected to be compared and a validation simulation is carried out, except for [116], which is validated via both the simulation setup and hardware setup. A comprehensive performance comparison is shown in Table 12.…”
Section: Figure 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies on cornering resistance have focused on interpreting it. Although certain studies analyzed the driving energy of a vehicle according to the steering angle [18] and tire slippage energy [19], the cornering resistance was not considered in their approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%