2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torque Penetrometric Test for the in-situ characterisation of historical mortars: fracture mechanics interpretation and experimental validation

Abstract: The assessment of historical structures requires appropriate knowledge of the behaviour of the investigated materials. Concerning masonry, its mechanical characterisation is a challenging task, since its composite nature requires the careful evaluation of the behaviour of its material components. In particular, the experimental assessment of the strength of existing mortar in historical structures still encounters several difficulties. This study investigates a novel Minor Destructive Testing (MDT) technique v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(55 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, seven types of mortars were prepared and tested (see Table 2). All of them presented a lime/aggregate volume ratio 1:3 as it is the one commonly used for the historical mortars [22,23]. Volume proportions of compounds were converted to weight to obtain a convenient measurement for the mixing process.…”
Section: Mortar Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, seven types of mortars were prepared and tested (see Table 2). All of them presented a lime/aggregate volume ratio 1:3 as it is the one commonly used for the historical mortars [22,23]. Volume proportions of compounds were converted to weight to obtain a convenient measurement for the mixing process.…”
Section: Mortar Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, direct tensile tests of the fibre glass wires were executed in order to examine the nominal properties indicated by the producer. Some non-standard material tests were also carried out by using non-destructive test methods as proposed in Marastoni et al (2016), with a very good agreement with the standardized procedures. In Tables 1 and 2 the nominal and experimental results of the tests carried out on the materials are reported.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Materialsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The foundations investigation has also confirmed the probable difference in the construction period of some parts of the building [27,28]; • Sonic investigations on some walls, in those areas where the crack pattern showed fissures of doubtful interpretation, in order to investigate the panel homogeneity and identify possible detachments of internal leaves and/or surface plasters; • Superficial and deep penetrometric tests for mortars characterization; • Bricks characterization based on the behavior detected on bricks preserved on site and probably contemporary to the ones in use. The results obtained were compared with values available in the literature for materials of the same type and period [29][30][31]; • Penetrometric tests (©Resistograph) to characterize the timber floors and roofs [32][33][34].…”
Section: Mechanical Characterization Of Materials and Rapid Vulnerabimentioning
confidence: 99%