2013
DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-11-00006.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tornado Intensity Estimation: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract: The enhanced Fujita scale, devised to rate wind damage more precisely, will need accountability and flexibility to keep pace with advances in mapping, documentation, and the growing understanding of structural responses to airflow.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Questions such as these are commonly asked of meteorologists and climatologists, but, to date, the current literature indicates a gap in the means to quantify the severity of a winter season to allow for objective comparison. Previous research has provided a means to quantify the intensity of hurricanes (Saffir-Simpson scale; Simpson 1974), tornadoes (Fujita and enhanced Fujita scales;Fujita 1971;Edwards et al 2013), droughts (Drought Monitor; Svoboda et al 2002), and winter storms (Zielinski 2002; Northeast snowfall impact scale; Kocin and Uccellini 2004;Cerruti and Decker 2011). The use of scaling allows comparison of event characteristics, as well as impacts that either are explicitly included as an index factor or are compared against the background of the scales that are more meteorological or measurable in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions such as these are commonly asked of meteorologists and climatologists, but, to date, the current literature indicates a gap in the means to quantify the severity of a winter season to allow for objective comparison. Previous research has provided a means to quantify the intensity of hurricanes (Saffir-Simpson scale; Simpson 1974), tornadoes (Fujita and enhanced Fujita scales;Fujita 1971;Edwards et al 2013), droughts (Drought Monitor; Svoboda et al 2002), and winter storms (Zielinski 2002; Northeast snowfall impact scale; Kocin and Uccellini 2004;Cerruti and Decker 2011). The use of scaling allows comparison of event characteristics, as well as impacts that either are explicitly included as an index factor or are compared against the background of the scales that are more meteorological or measurable in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ratings have been used for the study of tornado climatology across the United States and the correlation of environmental parameters with the occurrence of tornadoes of particular intensity (e.g., Kerr and Darkow 1996;Brooks and Doswell 2001;Brooks et al 2003; Thompson et al 2003Thompson et al , 2007Brooks 2004;Mead and Thompson 2011;Garner 2012); the EF scale ratings are of interest to meteorologists as well as to those in many other industries (e.g., Womble and Smith 2009;Womble et al 2009Womble et al , 2011Thampi et al 2011;Kuligowski et al 2013). For a general discussion on the history, development, advantages, and limitations of the EF scale, readers are referred to Doswell et al (2009) and Edwards et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/), maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service (NWS). It is one of the most comprehensive and primary sources of long-term records on hydrological hazards in the United States with detailed records on the induced economic cost and casualty [40][41][42] and have been used in many studies [41,[43][44][45][46][47]. The records of hydrological hazards may be provided by or gathered from sources outside the NWS, such as the media, law enforcement and/or other government agencies, emergency managers, private companies and individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%