Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3183713.3196920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TopPPR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger the node's degree is, the more likely the node is selected into 𝑄 2 . Note that the PageRank distribution of a real-world network is experimentally observed to follow the power-law distribution [4,26,37,38]. In particular, the power-law exponent of the PageRank distribution is the same as that of the degree distribution of the network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The larger the node's degree is, the more likely the node is selected into 𝑄 2 . Note that the PageRank distribution of a real-world network is experimentally observed to follow the power-law distribution [4,26,37,38]. In particular, the power-law exponent of the PageRank distribution is the same as that of the degree distribution of the network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although there exist algorithms [13,14,18,20,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] that efficiently calculate the approximate PPR values, in this paper, we focus on this matrix form to calculate the proximity matrix due to its mathematically clean definition for analysis. Frequently used notations can be found in Appendix A.…”
Section: Preliminaries 21 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monte Carlo algorithm exploits short random walk segments starting at each node in the graph. Wei et al proposed TopPPR to compute the top- k entries up to a user specified precision [ 12 ]. TopPPR minimizes the accuracy loss through random walk sampling, forward search, and backward search in large graphs and also ensures accuracy.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have made efforts to solve the overhead of graph processing based on various software approaches [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], but they still use a large memory size. Furthermore, though researchers have also proposed graph-processing accelerators [ 9 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], such a fixed hardware accelerator, they cannot provide flexibility in graph processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%