2015
DOI: 10.4310/cms.2015.v13.n5.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology preservation for image-registration-related deformation fields

Abstract: In this paper, we address the issue of designing a theoretically well-motivated and computationally efficient method ensuring topology preservation on image-registration-related deformation fields. The model is motivated by a mathematical characterization of topology preservation for a deformation field mapping two subsets of Z 2 , namely, positivity of the four approximations to the Jacobian determinant of the deformation on a square patch. The first step of the proposed algorithm thus consists in correcting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work is closest in spirit to that of Droske & Rumpf [14], Rumpf [27] and Rumpf & Wirth [26], who like us make use of the existence theory for polyconvex energies in [4], as also do Burger, Modersitski & Ruthotto [9], Debroux et al [12], Iglesias, Rumpf & Scherzer [16] and Iglesias [15]. Other nonlinear elasticity approaches are due to Lin, Dinov, Toga & Vese [19], Ozeré, Gout & Le Guyader [22], Ozeré & Le Guyader [23], Simon, Sheorey, Jacobs & Basri [28] and Debroux & Le Guyader [13]. Key differences with these works are: (i) that we minimize among homeomorphisms of the image domains rather than applying Dirichlet or other boundary conditions, (ii) technical improvements as regards the regularity of the intensity maps, and (iii) a novel analysis of linearly related images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our work is closest in spirit to that of Droske & Rumpf [14], Rumpf [27] and Rumpf & Wirth [26], who like us make use of the existence theory for polyconvex energies in [4], as also do Burger, Modersitski & Ruthotto [9], Debroux et al [12], Iglesias, Rumpf & Scherzer [16] and Iglesias [15]. Other nonlinear elasticity approaches are due to Lin, Dinov, Toga & Vese [19], Ozeré, Gout & Le Guyader [22], Ozeré & Le Guyader [23], Simon, Sheorey, Jacobs & Basri [28] and Debroux & Le Guyader [13]. Key differences with these works are: (i) that we minimize among homeomorphisms of the image domains rather than applying Dirichlet or other boundary conditions, (ii) technical improvements as regards the regularity of the intensity maps, and (iii) a novel analysis of linearly related images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…An alternative method would consist of applying a correction step when the Jacobian is not positive, as done by Ozeré and Le Guyader in [41].…”
Section: Regridding Technique Choice Of the Parameters And Registramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Jacobian determinant has been used in problems involving deformable structures in order to achieve more realistic transformations (e.g. Christensen et al (1996), Ashburner et al (1999), Ozere and Le Guyader (2015)). However, in this section we cover only those that have a relation with the modeling of deformable objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%