2017
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization with multiple materials via moving morphable component (MMC) method

Abstract: Summary With the fast development of additive manufacturing technology, topology optimization involving multiple materials has received ever increasing attention. Traditionally, this kind of optimization problem is solved within the implicit solution framework by using the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization or level set method. This treatment, however, will inevitably lead to a large number of design variables especially when many types of materials are involved and 3‐dimensional (3D) problems are cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also recently, the work in Ref. [34] extends the moving morphable components method to accommodate multiple materials by seeding the initial design with geometric components made of different materials (i.e., the material of a component does not change during the optimization). The material interpolation scheme in regions where two or more geometric components intersect chooses the stiffer material of any intersecting component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also recently, the work in Ref. [34] extends the moving morphable components method to accommodate multiple materials by seeding the initial design with geometric components made of different materials (i.e., the material of a component does not change during the optimization). The material interpolation scheme in regions where two or more geometric components intersect chooses the stiffer material of any intersecting component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When level set description with extended finite element model is used, the jump term must be calculated exactly. However, this term can be smeared out when the ersatz material is adopted for finite element analysis …”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this term can be smeared out when the ersatz material is adopted for finite element analysis. 44 Since the ersatz material is adopted in this work, which will be described in Section 5.3 the jump term is temporarily ignored in the following sensitivity analysis. To obtain the shape derivatives, the adjoint method are employed and the Lagrangian is defined as…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike DMO, this method employs optimization constraints to ensure these size variables are 0 or 1, and to guarantee that each component has at most one material with a size variable of 1. The moving morphable component method has been applied to the design of multi-material structures [41] with geometric components made of different materials; however, unlike all of the aforementioned multi-material methods, the choice of material for each component is fixed and therefore not part of the optimization. This work focuses on the topology optimization of multi-material lattice structures using the geometry projection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%