2006
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization of acoustic–structure interaction problems using a mixed finite element formulation

Abstract: SUMMARYThe paper presents a gradient based topology optimization formulation that allows to solve acousticstructure (vibro-acoustic) interaction problems without explicit boundary interface representation. In acoustic-structure interaction problems, the pressure and displacement fields are governed by Helmholtz equation and the elasticity equation, respectively. Normally, the two separate fields are coupled by surface-coupling integrals, however, such a formulation does not allow for free material redistributi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
79
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for element stacking, no special numerical treatment was conducted to obtain the result. Though not explicitly shown, the result agrees well with results obtained earlier by other methods [Hammer and Olhoff 2000;Sigmund and Clausen 2007;Yoon et al 2006].…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Except for element stacking, no special numerical treatment was conducted to obtain the result. Though not explicitly shown, the result agrees well with results obtained earlier by other methods [Hammer and Olhoff 2000;Sigmund and Clausen 2007;Yoon et al 2006].…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The design-dependent pressure-loaded problem is an interesting problem that has received some attention in the topology optimization community [Hammer and Olhoff 2000;Sigmund and Clausen 2007;Yoon et al 2006]. Figure 10 (top) depicts the problem under consideration.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations