2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-012-0759-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and stress constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
102
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
102
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…stresses. As investigated in [23], the formulation adopts the weight of the structure as objective function, including an energy-based constraint to control deformability and a selected set of constraints to control undesired stress peaks, if needed. Instead of using the displacement-based strain energy to evaluate the structural compliance, the stress-based complementary energy is herein considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stresses. As investigated in [23], the formulation adopts the weight of the structure as objective function, including an energy-based constraint to control deformability and a selected set of constraints to control undesired stress peaks, if needed. Instead of using the displacement-based strain energy to evaluate the structural compliance, the stress-based complementary energy is herein considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a review of the recent developments in SIMP, the reader is referred to [17,18]. Research has also been conducted in using TO with material failure constraints [19] and stress constraints [20]. TO has been widely used in different domains such as fluid flow [21], heat transfer [22] and aerospace design [23,24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] There are two main difficulties associated with stress constraints when the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) approach is used for material parameterization. The first difficulty consists in the local nature of material failure constraints, which provides a major challenge due to the large number of stress constraints and their high nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%