2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-008-0172-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology-Invariant Similarity of Nonrigid Shapes

Abstract: This paper explores the problem of similarity criteria between nonrigid shapes. Broadly speaking, such criteria are divided into intrinsic and extrinsic, the first referring to the metric structure of the object and the latter to how it is laid out in the Euclidean space. Both criteria have their advantages and disadvantages: extrinsic similarity is sensitive to nonrigid deformations, while intrinsic similarity is sensitive to topological noise. In this paper, we approach the problem from the perspective of me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several techniques have been proposed for robust symmetry detection -voting procedure in a transformation space [24,28,34,36,48], shape descriptors based on spherical harmonics [23,25,38], and graph matching [2,4]. Change in pose, and non-rigid shapes and transformations make symmetry identification difficult and requires detection of symmetry with respect to non-rigid transformations [8,27,31,37,48].…”
Section: Symmetry In Geometric Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been proposed for robust symmetry detection -voting procedure in a transformation space [24,28,34,36,48], shape descriptors based on spherical harmonics [23,25,38], and graph matching [2,4]. Change in pose, and non-rigid shapes and transformations make symmetry identification difficult and requires detection of symmetry with respect to non-rigid transformations [8,27,31,37,48].…”
Section: Symmetry In Geometric Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, pose invariance is achieved by embedding the shape into an isometric subspace [21,12,4,29,25,15,16]. This is a very strong assumption for multicamera acquisition systems, as the independently reconstructed shapes can be non-isometric due to presence of topological merges and splits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an entirely different class of approaches, based on surface geometry, see, for example, Bronstein et al [12] and their excellent monograph [11] which provides an extensive bibliography. Also, the discussion of methods developed for 2D image registration is beyond scope here.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%