2002
DOI: 10.1080/03052150210908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology Design of Planar Cross-Sections with a Genetic Algorithm: Part 1--Overcoming the Obstacles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the disadvantages in computational cost [29] and representation degeneracy [28,36] were also addressed. Fanjoy and Crossley [32,33] investigated the use of a GA for topology design of planar cross-sections under bending and torsion. Four crossover methods were examined and a chromosome mask was used to enforce connectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the disadvantages in computational cost [29] and representation degeneracy [28,36] were also addressed. Fanjoy and Crossley [32,33] investigated the use of a GA for topology design of planar cross-sections under bending and torsion. Four crossover methods were examined and a chromosome mask was used to enforce connectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bit-array representation method has been widely adopted since it is an intuitive and straightforward method to represent the structural topology for the optimal topology design problems using the GAs [36]. This GA-based approach has been extended by Jakiela and co-workers [27,31,38], Schoenauer and co-workers, [28,29,36], Fanjoy and Crossley [32,33], and, more recently, by Wang and Tai [6]. Jakiela and co-workers [27,31,38] extended the work of Sandgren et al [26] by addressing such problems as cantilevered plate topologies of high discretization, techniques for obtaining finely discretized topologies, techniques for obtaining families of highly fit designs and a variety of different structural design fitness functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the original '0-1' optimization problem was attacked directly by using a bit-array representation and a genetic algorithm. The work of Sandgren and his co-workers, using bit-array representation, has been extended by Jakiela and his coworkers [3][4][5], by Schoenauer and his co-workers [6,7,9], by Fanjoy and Crossley [8,10], and, more recently, by Wang and Tai [11]. Although all these extensions can well prevent checkerboard patterns by exploiting a connectiva Corresponding author: matthieu.domaszewski@utbm.fr ity restriction, the other numerical instabilities in structural topology optimization such as mesh dependency and one-node connections still exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Δx ie = rand · (−1) round(rand) (8) where x ie is density variable,x ie is the ie element density computed using the expression 7 and Δx ie is real value randomly generated using expression (8).…”
Section: Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1 1 ) To enhance the search efficiency of GA, a "direct" crossover [16,[33][34][35][36][37][38] scheme is adopted, which directly acts on phenotype (structures in 3D space in our case) rather than on genotype (a linear list of numbers in Equation (11) in our case) as the conventional crossovers. As in [16], this is achieved by:…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%