2008
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology‐based models and NMR structures in protein folding simulations

Abstract: Topology-based interaction potentials are simplified models that use the native contacts in the folded structure of a protein to define an energetically unfrustrated folding funnel. They have been widely used to analyze the folding transition and pathways of different proteins through computer simulations. Obviously, they need a reliable, experimentally determined folded structure to define the model interactions. In structures elucidated through NMR spectroscopy, a complex treatment of the raw experimental da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gō-model assigned an average of 1.2/1.1 (NT-NtrC) and 1.6/1.3 (Spo0F) native contacts per residue in the N-/C-subdomains, respectively. The lower average number of contacts for NT-NtrC compared to Spo0F reflects the limitations of the solution NMR structure for NT-NtrC compared to the crystal structures for Spo0F and CheY 46,47. The smaller number of native contact potentials to promote folding for NT-NtrC results in a lower energy barrier between the unfolded and folded basins than in the case of Spo0F (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Gō-model assigned an average of 1.2/1.1 (NT-NtrC) and 1.6/1.3 (Spo0F) native contacts per residue in the N-/C-subdomains, respectively. The lower average number of contacts for NT-NtrC compared to Spo0F reflects the limitations of the solution NMR structure for NT-NtrC compared to the crystal structures for Spo0F and CheY 46,47. The smaller number of native contact potentials to promote folding for NT-NtrC results in a lower energy barrier between the unfolded and folded basins than in the case of Spo0F (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A common means to safeguard against this is to compare folding results for multiple proteins obtained using the same model in light of available experimental data. Simulation results can also be influenced by the experimental structure from which the Gō model is derived, particularly the method used in its solution [ 137 , 138 ]. Note that NtrC exhibits a lower folding barrier than CheY and Spo0F in Figure 1 , a result of having fewer native contacts overall and therefore a smoother landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Gō model is native-centric, it is natural to expect that simulated folding behaviour may be sensitive to the exact set of atomic coordinates that define the native structure. This question was originally addressed by Rey and co-workers in the context of a C α representation [38], [39], and later explored by one of us in the context of a full atomistic representation [19]. In the present work we explored the impact on folding of a particular aspect of the native structure of protein β2m, which is the existence of a SS-bond between residues 25 and 80.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%