1998
DOI: 10.1559/152304098782383007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topologically Correct Subdivision Simplification Using the Bandwidth Criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tGAP structure uses BLG (Binary Line Generalisation) trees; for each edge one tree that stores the result of the Douglas-Peucker algorithm (Douglas and Peucker, 1973) for line simplification. Here we chose for on-line simplification and use an optimisation algorithm from de Berg et al (1998).…”
Section: Filling the Structure With Generalisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The tGAP structure uses BLG (Binary Line Generalisation) trees; for each edge one tree that stores the result of the Douglas-Peucker algorithm (Douglas and Peucker, 1973) for line simplification. Here we chose for on-line simplification and use an optimisation algorithm from de Berg et al (1998).…”
Section: Filling the Structure With Generalisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our generalisation method for deriving the dataset at the lowest LoD comprises three generalisation operators that we apply in succession: A skeletonisation method that collapses narrow areas and area parts to lines (Haunert and Sester, 2008), an optimisation method that aggregates areas to satisfy size constraints (Haunert and Wolff, 2006), and an optimisation method for line simplification (de Berg et al, 1998). Figure 3 shows a sample from the input dataset ATKIS DLM 50 that we generalised with this work flow according to specifications for the ATKIS DLM 250.…”
Section: Generalisation Methods For the Lowest Lodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This issue was considered in Jones et al (2000), who also presented a scheme for keeping track of different levels of topological consistency. Several algorithms have been presented for generalising lines in a topologically consistent manner, including de Berg (1998), Saalfield (1999), van der Poorten and Jones (1999) and Ai et al (2000), but there has been little progress in the application of such procedures for priority labelling of vertices in a multi-scale database in order to guarantee topological consistency across retrieved levels of detail of the line and area primitives.…”
Section: Multi-scale Spatial Data Access Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%