The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological theory of abnormal grain growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of abnormal grain growth has been attributed to the initial microstructure, including the distribution of the grain size, misorientation, grain boundary energy and mobility, triple junction mobility, impurities, microstrain, topological features such as curvature and number of boundary faces, etc. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) annealing experiments (both in situ and ex situ) of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni have shown that the grain growth is driven by a few grains at the expense of the surrounding nanograins, which is consistent with abnormal grain growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The observation of abnormal grain growth has been attributed to the initial microstructure, including the distribution of the grain size, misorientation, grain boundary energy and mobility, triple junction mobility, impurities, microstrain, topological features such as curvature and number of boundary faces, etc. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) annealing experiments (both in situ and ex situ) of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni have shown that the grain growth is driven by a few grains at the expense of the surrounding nanograins, which is consistent with abnormal grain growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…10a and 10b). The results clearly indicate that for isotropic grain growth there exist a single steady state, which is perfectly characterized by the formulation proposed by Rios [66,67,69]. The greatest advantage of the level set model is that it allows simulating complex cases without the necessity of explicit handling of the topological transformations.…”
Section: Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This result for grain growth is qualitatively comparable to the findings of Glicksman [50], where they succeed in describing three dimensional grain boundary structures by average n-hedra. This constructible or non-constructible, but mathematically defined n-hedra, is used as a topological proxy of network polyhedral that contain the same number of faces [51,52]. Different grain topologies can be introduced by setting appropriate boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%