2017
DOI: 10.4310/atmp.2017.v21.n8.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological orders and factorization homology

Abstract: In the study of 2d (the space dimension) topological orders, it is well-known that bulk excitations are classified by unitary modular tensor categories. But these categories only describe the local observables on an open 2-disk in the long wave length limit. For example, the notion of braiding only makes sense locally. It is natural to ask how to obtain global observables on a closed surface. The answer is provided by the theory of factorization homology. We compute the factorization homology of a closed surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If one inserts a finite number of particlelike excitations x 1 , · · · ,x r on the closed surface, one simply obtain the Hilbert space hom C (1,x 1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ x r ), which is also the space of degenerate ground states. This result remains to be true for all closed two-dimensional manifolds with topological gapped defects and with two cells decorated by different phases [53]. This includes the cases that the topological order is defined on any surfaces with boundaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If one inserts a finite number of particlelike excitations x 1 , · · · ,x r on the closed surface, one simply obtain the Hilbert space hom C (1,x 1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ x r ), which is also the space of degenerate ground states. This result remains to be true for all closed two-dimensional manifolds with topological gapped defects and with two cells decorated by different phases [53]. This includes the cases that the topological order is defined on any surfaces with boundaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that the category C should equipped with a natural functor to the category of finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, which is a factorization homology M of a UMTC M [53]. So we expect that we should be able to embed C into a UMTC M such that the embedding naturally descends to a functor C → M on factorization homologies.…”
Section: Appendix C: Conditions To Obtain Umtc /E 'Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the fusion of gapped domain walls [KK,FS2,LWW,HW,AKZ,Ka], we can obtain a new gapless edge of the 2d bulk phase (C, c) by fusing a canonical edge (V, B ) of (B, c) with a gapped wall M between (B, c) and (C, c). We denote the new gapless edge obtained from this fusion by (V, B ) (B,c) M, or graphically as follows:…”
Section: General Chiral Gapless Edgesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We write Aut qu (PH) for the automorphisms of PH which leave transition probabilities invariant, and Aut qu (H) for the group of unitary and antiunitary operators on H. By a famous theorem of Wigner [78], there is a short exact sequence If a quantum system comes endowed with a specified Hamiltonian H on H, we would like to restrict to the subgroup of symmetries Aut qu (H, H) ⊂ Aut qu (H) which projectively commute with the Hamiltonian. That is, we demand that there is a map c : Aut qu (H, H) × H → U (1) such that T Hψ = c(T, ψ) H T ψ for all ψ ∈ H and T ∈ Aut qu (H, H). By refining the treatment in [27], we show in Section 3.3 directly from this setup that the only consistent choices of such maps are given by continuous Z 2 -gradings c : Aut qu (H, H) → Z 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%