1975
DOI: 10.1070/im1975v009n04abeh001497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TOPOLOGICAL INVARIANTS OF ELLIPTIC OPERATORS. I:K-HOMOLOGY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion is a functional-analytic abstraction of the notion of elliptic pseudodifferential operator on a compact manifold. The idea that abstract elliptic operators can be naturally considered as elements of the K-homology groups, suggested by Atiyah [2], was realized by Kasparov (see [110]). …”
Section: Noncommutative Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion is a functional-analytic abstraction of the notion of elliptic pseudodifferential operator on a compact manifold. The idea that abstract elliptic operators can be naturally considered as elements of the K-homology groups, suggested by Atiyah [2], was realized by Kasparov (see [110]). …”
Section: Noncommutative Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing the Khomology class of the signature operator on a non-simply connected manifold, one could hope to redo what Lusztig had done, but in a more powerful setting. Kasparov's earliest results in this direction, as well as the first announcements of his results on the Novikov Conjecture, appeared in [Kas1] and [Kas2], although the power of his methods did not become clear until the development of the "KK calculus" in [Kas3]. (For more informal expositions, see also [Black] and [Fack1].)…”
Section: Kasparov and Operator-theoretic K-homologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element (µ, l) ∈ H 3 G (Ψ) is realized by the Morita trivialization (22). Now let C be the conjugacy class of exp(ξ), and Φ : C → G the inclusion.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Section we review Kasparov's definition of K-homology [23,22] for C * -algebras. Excellent references for this material are the books by Higson-Roe [19] and Blackadar [5].…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%