Abstract:SummaryThe double helical nature of DNA implies that progression of transcription machinery that cannot rotate easily around the DNA axis creates waves of positive supercoils ahead of it and negative supercoils behind it. Using topological reporters that detect local variations in DNA supercoiling, we have characterized the diffusion of transcription-induced (TI) positive supercoils in plasmids or in the chromosome of wild type Escherichia coli cells. Transcription-induced positive supercoils were able to diff… Show more
“…Any effects would depend on how far such gradients extend. Current estimates suggest that, depending on the strength of the signal, gradients may extend for up to a few kilobases (Krasilnikov et al 1999;Moulin et al 2005;Kouzine et al 2008), and therefore their influence will be local rather than global (Sobetzko 2016;Meyer and Beslon 2014). Since transcription is a dominant source of the local generation of superhelicity, the relative orientation of neighboring genes determines how transcription of one may affect the activity of its neighbor by supercoilingmediated coupling.…”
Section: Gradients Of Superhelicity and Protein Bindingmentioning
We argue that dynamic changes in DNA supercoiling in vivo determine both how DNA is packaged and how it is accessed for transcription and for other manipulations such as recombination. In both bacteria and eukaryotes, the principal generators of DNA superhelicity are DNA translocases, supplemented in bacteria by DNA gyrase. By generating gradients of superhelicity upstream and downstream of their site of activity, translocases enable the differential binding of proteins which preferentially interact with respectively more untwisted or more writhed DNA. Such preferences enable, in principle, the sequential binding of different classes of protein and so constitute an essential driver of chromatin organization.Keywords DNA supercoiling . DNA translocases . Chromatin organization . Superhelicity gradients . DNA untwisting . DNAwrithing Dynamic changes of DNA supercoiling act as a driving force behind the alterations of genetic activity and DNA compaction both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Both these processes involve formation of spatially organized nucleoprotein structures by DNA architectural proteins. Whereas in eukaryotes the paradigmal example is the histone octamer, in prokaryotes a similar function is attributed to a small class of highly abundant nucleoid-associated proteins. We argue that, depending on the primary sequence organization, the changes of superhelicity elicit various alterations of local DNA geometry, while these, in turn, facilitate the assembly of distinct nucleoprotein structures pertinent to genetic function. Genome-wide conversion of the superhelical energy into various three-dimensional DNA structures thus acts as an analogue code coordinating the energy supply with the genetic expression of the chromosome.Recent studies make it increasingly clear that the DNA double helix carries at least two types of encoded information and that these include the well-known genetic code and the structural information determining the form and physical properties of the double helix itself. Since both these information types are inscribed in the same DNA sequence, and yet one is discrete whereas the other is continuous, they have been respectively dubbed the digital and analog DNA codes (Marr et al. 2008;Travers et al. 2012;Muskhelishvili and Travers 2013). The potential of the DNA to adopt distinct configurations is strongly modulated by DNA supercoiling, which is increasingly recognized as one of the major forces coordinating the cellular DNA transactions in both prokaryotes (including Archaea) and eukaryotes.DNA supercoiling can be generated by the simple application of torque to the double helix (Strick et al. 1998) but, importantly, because the DNA molecule itself possesses chirality-it is, after all, a right-handed double helix-the local structures stabilized by changes in superhelical density depend on both the sign and strength of the applied torque. For example, both positive and negative torque (respectively overand underwinding of the double helix) can change the intrinsic coiling of ...
“…Any effects would depend on how far such gradients extend. Current estimates suggest that, depending on the strength of the signal, gradients may extend for up to a few kilobases (Krasilnikov et al 1999;Moulin et al 2005;Kouzine et al 2008), and therefore their influence will be local rather than global (Sobetzko 2016;Meyer and Beslon 2014). Since transcription is a dominant source of the local generation of superhelicity, the relative orientation of neighboring genes determines how transcription of one may affect the activity of its neighbor by supercoilingmediated coupling.…”
Section: Gradients Of Superhelicity and Protein Bindingmentioning
We argue that dynamic changes in DNA supercoiling in vivo determine both how DNA is packaged and how it is accessed for transcription and for other manipulations such as recombination. In both bacteria and eukaryotes, the principal generators of DNA superhelicity are DNA translocases, supplemented in bacteria by DNA gyrase. By generating gradients of superhelicity upstream and downstream of their site of activity, translocases enable the differential binding of proteins which preferentially interact with respectively more untwisted or more writhed DNA. Such preferences enable, in principle, the sequential binding of different classes of protein and so constitute an essential driver of chromatin organization.Keywords DNA supercoiling . DNA translocases . Chromatin organization . Superhelicity gradients . DNA untwisting . DNAwrithing Dynamic changes of DNA supercoiling act as a driving force behind the alterations of genetic activity and DNA compaction both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Both these processes involve formation of spatially organized nucleoprotein structures by DNA architectural proteins. Whereas in eukaryotes the paradigmal example is the histone octamer, in prokaryotes a similar function is attributed to a small class of highly abundant nucleoid-associated proteins. We argue that, depending on the primary sequence organization, the changes of superhelicity elicit various alterations of local DNA geometry, while these, in turn, facilitate the assembly of distinct nucleoprotein structures pertinent to genetic function. Genome-wide conversion of the superhelical energy into various three-dimensional DNA structures thus acts as an analogue code coordinating the energy supply with the genetic expression of the chromosome.Recent studies make it increasingly clear that the DNA double helix carries at least two types of encoded information and that these include the well-known genetic code and the structural information determining the form and physical properties of the double helix itself. Since both these information types are inscribed in the same DNA sequence, and yet one is discrete whereas the other is continuous, they have been respectively dubbed the digital and analog DNA codes (Marr et al. 2008;Travers et al. 2012;Muskhelishvili and Travers 2013). The potential of the DNA to adopt distinct configurations is strongly modulated by DNA supercoiling, which is increasingly recognized as one of the major forces coordinating the cellular DNA transactions in both prokaryotes (including Archaea) and eukaryotes.DNA supercoiling can be generated by the simple application of torque to the double helix (Strick et al. 1998) but, importantly, because the DNA molecule itself possesses chirality-it is, after all, a right-handed double helix-the local structures stabilized by changes in superhelical density depend on both the sign and strength of the applied torque. For example, both positive and negative torque (respectively overand underwinding of the double helix) can change the intrinsic coiling of ...
“…Topoisomerases are thought to create topological barriers in at least two different ways: on the one hand, they were shown to preferentially bind to juxtaposed DNA helices, which could allow them to generate transient interconnections between different DNA regions [Zechiedrich and Osheroff, 1990]. Accordingly, DNA gyrase was demonstrated to block diffusion of transcription-induced supercoils in E. coli, when associated with its catalytic target sites [Moulin et al, 2005]. On the other hand, topoisomerases are responsible for decatenating entangled DNA and controlling the superhelicity of individual DNA segments.…”
Section: Mechansims Of Nucleoid Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA polymerase complex is too large to follow the individual helical turns of DNA. Its movement along the template strand, therefore, transiently generates domains of positive and negative supercoiling, respectively, ahead and behind the transcriptional bubble [Wu et al, 1988;Rahmouni and Wells, 1992;Moulin et al, 2005]. These topological changes are significantly stabilized if the transcript encodes a membrane protein [Liu and Wang, 1987;Lodge et al, 1989;Lynch and Wang, 1993], because transcription and co-transcriptional translation are coupled with the insertion of nascent polypeptides into the membrane in bacteria, thereby tethering RNA polymerase to the site of protein translocation [Binenbaum et al, 1999].…”
Section: Mechansims Of Nucleoid Organizationmentioning
Recent advances in bacterial cell biology have revealed unanticipated structural and functional complexity, reminiscent of eukaryotic cells. Particular progress has been made in understanding the structure, replication, and segregation of the bacterial chromosome. It emerged that multiple mechanisms cooperate to establish a dynamic assembly of supercoiled domains, which are stacked in consecutive order to adopt a defined higher-level organization. The position of genetic loci on the chromosome is thereby linearly correlated with their position in the cell. SMC complexes and histone-like proteins continuously remodel the nucleoid to reconcile chromatin compaction with DNA replication and gene regulation. Moreover, active transport processes ensure the efficient segregation of sister chromosomes and the faithful restoration of nucleoid organization while DNA replication and condensation are in progress.
“…Взаимодействуя с ними, ДНК-гираза может вызывать релаксацию положительных супервитков в ДНК, закономерно накапливающихся в 3'-концевых областях генов в результате транскрипции и ингибирующих считывание следующего гена [10]. Специфически связывающие топоизомеразу REP-элементы, расположенные между последовательными генами, могут снижать это напряжение, стимулируя синтез РНК [11].…”
Аннотация. В межгенных участках генома кишечной палочки находится 356 участков, содержащих от 1 до 12 повторяющихся последовательностей с вырожденным консенсусом, названных REP-элементами. Их биологическая роль мало понятна, но множественность в геноме, преимущественная локализация между конвергентными генами и способность формировать шпилечные структуры послужили основанием для предположения об участии REP-элементов в терминации транскрипции или стабилизации соответствующих РНК, хотя прямые эксперименты не подтвердили способность модельных REP-элементов останавливать синтез РНК. В данной работе позиционный и функциональный анализ, выполненный для всей совокупности аннотированных REP-элементов, позволил установить факт снижения эффективности сквозного синтеза РНК для многих REP-модулей. Однако часть из них не влияла на процессивность транскрипции, что предполагает возможность регуляторного действия REP-элементов в составе РНК. Были также обнаружены REP-последовательности, после которых синтез РНК усиливался и найдены перекрывающиеся с ними промоторы. Выявлен особый характер расположения REP-элементов относительно промоторных островков, предполагающий вклад повторяющихся модулей в транскрипционную изоляцию островков и их функциональную автономию, а также биологическое значение островковых РНК.Ключевые слова: структурные элементы бактериального генома, REP-элементы, промоторы, промоторные островки, механизмы регуляции транскрипции.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.