2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.240404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological Degeneracy and Vortex Manipulation in Kitaev’s Honeycomb Model

Abstract: The classification of loop symmetries in Kitaev's honeycomb lattice model provides a natural framework to study the abelian topological degeneracy. We derive a perturbative low-energy effective Hamiltonian, that is valid to all orders of the expansion and for all possible toroidal configurations.Using this form we demonstrate at what order the system's topological degeneracy is lifted by finite size effects and note that in the thermodynamic limit it is robust to all orders. Further, we demonstrate that the lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next section, we introduce the model as well as its main properties. In particular, we discuss the importance of the boundary conditions and insist on the role played by conserved quantities 15 and the constraints resulting from them. In Sec.…”
Section: For Details)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section, we introduce the model as well as its main properties. In particular, we discuss the importance of the boundary conditions and insist on the role played by conserved quantities 15 and the constraints resulting from them. In Sec.…”
Section: For Details)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first study the quantum Ising chain in a transverse magnetic field, perhaps one of the most celebrated systems in condensed matter for offering a tractable solution and rich physics, one with plentiful studies even in the context of quenching [7,8,[28][29][30][31]. The second system, the Kitaev honeycomb model, is also special in its analytically soluble structure [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and has also received significant attention in the context of quenching [9]. The transverse Ising model maps to a p-wave superconducting chain [40], while the honeycomb lattice model maps to a p + ip superconductor coupled to a Z 2 gauge field [32,33,35,36], the latter thus being a natural two-dimensional extension of the former.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their properties, depending on the Chern number ν, are encoded in the low-energy part of the energy spectrum of the corresponding vortex sector. In the ν = 0 phases the vortex properties can be obtained analytically [27,55,56], but in the other phases this has to be done numerically by simulating vortex transport [40]. This has been explicitly studied in the |ν| = 1 phase of the original honeycomb model, where both the topological degeneracy [37,52] and the braid statistics [40,41] associated with the Majorana binding vortices have been verified.…”
Section: Vortices In Kitaev Spin Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example however is in understanding the robustness of the system to virtual processes which at an intermediate stage involve the excitation of fermions or vortices. This strength is exploited in the weak J limit and allows the low-energy sector of the full spin model to be perturbatively mapped to a toric code Hamiltonian [4,[55][56][57]. Note that only in the 0-fermion sector can the vortex eigenvalues of the full Kitaev spin model be exactly identified with the eigenvalues of the toric code excitations; see for example [57].…”
Section: Appendix C: Fermions Vortices and Spinsmentioning
confidence: 99%