2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nocx.2019.100028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological constraint model of high lithium content borate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11]. T g is in fact a nonmonotonic function of x in the here explored x range [30]. (ii) The induced dynamics is faster ( E a (Q max ) smaller) for larger x as a consequence of the dynamics of the alkalis being faster, as inferred in a recent study of Cs and Rb borate glasses [11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11]. T g is in fact a nonmonotonic function of x in the here explored x range [30]. (ii) The induced dynamics is faster ( E a (Q max ) smaller) for larger x as a consequence of the dynamics of the alkalis being faster, as inferred in a recent study of Cs and Rb borate glasses [11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For what concerns alkali borate glasses, calculating n c is not a trivial task due to the complex structural changes taking place on addition of alkali oxide. However, values of n c as a function of the alkali-metal oxide molar ratio have been reported that allow describing trends in important properties such as T g [30,33], the fragility [33], and the microhardness [34]. The values for E a (Q max ) are reported as a function of n c in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the n BO calculation, one can account for the superstructural units in lithium borate glasses using TCT [77]. However, the correlation between ν and n c when using TCT with and without accounting for superstructural units is similar, although the range of constraints is minimized when accounting for superstructural units (Supplementary Figure S5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topological constraint theory has been employed to solve many problems in the field of theoretical glass design. It has successfully predicted the compositional dependence of Vickers hardness, , fragility, changes in heat capacity at the glass transition, and glass transition temperature ( T g ). , Using the energy landscape approach of Naumis and the Adam–Gibbs model, Mauro et al showed that the ratio of two liquids’ configurational entropies S c is equal to the ratio of their topological degrees of freedom f per atom as follows: , where x is some glass composition and the subscript r denotes a reference value. f is given by where d is the dimensionality of the network and n is the number of constraints per atom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%