2019
DOI: 10.1080/10406638.2019.1703766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological Characterization of the Full k-Subdivision of a Family of Partial Cubes and Their Applications to α-Types of Novel Graphyne and Graphdiyne Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most common in silico approaches for the risk assessment of NMs is the development of QSAR-type models, that quantitatively correlate the bioactivity and toxicity of NMs with descriptors encoding their structural characteristics. [170] For the classic QSAR approach, there are several methods for the calculation of theoretical-structural descriptors for GBMs including the valency-based topological indices of chemical networks proposed by Hayat et al (2018), [178] the distance-based topological descriptors presented by Arockiaraj et al (2019), [179] or other properties such as diffusion inside the GBM calculated by rates as proposed by Kolokathis et al (2019). [180] Based on the QSAR approaches, different ML approaches have been developed that make use, apart from the classic molecular descriptors, of other nano-related properties (e.g., physicochemical characterization data, quantum-mechanical descriptors, energy data calculated by MD simulations, omics data etc.)…”
Section: Qsar-type Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most common in silico approaches for the risk assessment of NMs is the development of QSAR-type models, that quantitatively correlate the bioactivity and toxicity of NMs with descriptors encoding their structural characteristics. [170] For the classic QSAR approach, there are several methods for the calculation of theoretical-structural descriptors for GBMs including the valency-based topological indices of chemical networks proposed by Hayat et al (2018), [178] the distance-based topological descriptors presented by Arockiaraj et al (2019), [179] or other properties such as diffusion inside the GBM calculated by rates as proposed by Kolokathis et al (2019). [180] Based on the QSAR approaches, different ML approaches have been developed that make use, apart from the classic molecular descriptors, of other nano-related properties (e.g., physicochemical characterization data, quantum-mechanical descriptors, energy data calculated by MD simulations, omics data etc.)…”
Section: Qsar-type Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018), [ 178 ] the distance‐based topological descriptors presented by Arockiaraj et al. (2019), [ 179 ] or other properties such as diffusion inside the GBM calculated by rates as proposed by Kolokathis et al (2019). [ 180 ]…”
Section: Computational Approaches For Sbd Of Gbmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this type of TCN compound with Iron and cobalt the dual‐electrochromic device is formed by placing complex nanosheets on either side of a pair of transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes [20]. Various topological indices pertaining to the graphene nanosheet structures have been studied from some of the recent literature of chemical graph theory [18,19]. However, the topological descriptors for the TC graphene structure have not been explored, and it would be important to conduct a research investigation of the topological indices of this different network in order to compare and contrast the complexity of this structure due to its important applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these topological descriptors are invariant to labelings, they play a vital role in the quantitative analysis of structural activity, property, and toxicity relationships (QSAR/QSPR/QSTR) [54]. A wide range of topological descriptors have been developed to date for the characterization of chemical structures and nanomaterials [43,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. In this paper, we compute two different classes of topological descriptors for wave-like graphene-based nanoribbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%