2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aacd7c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological bound states in interacting Su–Schrieffer–Heeger rings

Abstract: We study two-particle states in a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain with periodic boundary conditions and nearest-neighbor (NN) interactions. The system is mapped into a problem of a single particle in a two-dimensional (2D) SSH lattice with potential walls along specific edges. The 2D SSH model has a trivial Chern number but a non-trivial Zak's phase, the one-dimensional (1D) topological invariant, along specific directions of the lattice, which allow for the presence of topological edge states. Using center-o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to circumvent these limitations a third mapping can be introduced, through a basis rotation of (3) (see [43] for details), wherein inversion symmetry and, therefore, a quantized Zak's phase for each band, is recovered. Under this third mapping the system becomes a diamond chain with alternating tunneling amplitudes, whose non-trivial topological nature of the gaps where the edge states lie is explicitly shown in [46,47]. A striking feature of the topology of this model, directly carried over to the original OAM l = 1 model, is that there is no topological transition across the gap closing point, as can be seen by fixing either J 2 or J 3 and varying the other across zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to circumvent these limitations a third mapping can be introduced, through a basis rotation of (3) (see [43] for details), wherein inversion symmetry and, therefore, a quantized Zak's phase for each band, is recovered. Under this third mapping the system becomes a diamond chain with alternating tunneling amplitudes, whose non-trivial topological nature of the gaps where the edge states lie is explicitly shown in [46,47]. A striking feature of the topology of this model, directly carried over to the original OAM l = 1 model, is that there is no topological transition across the gap closing point, as can be seen by fixing either J 2 or J 3 and varying the other across zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a concrete example of the approach described in the previous sections, here we consider the spinless Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model in the presence of electron-electron interaction. Various versions of interacting SSH model has been studied previously and investigated by different methods [42][43][44][45][46]. The topological properties in the noninteracting limit, on the other hand, has been studied experimentally by means of optical lattices [47,48].…”
Section: A Topological Invariant and Edge States Of Interacting Ssh mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two-body states, which are stable even for repulsive interactions due to the finite bandwidth of the singleparticle kinetic energy [9], have been observed [10][11][12][13] and extensively analyzed [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] in optical lattices, and have also been emulated in photonic systems [26,27] and in topolectrical circuits [28]. Motivated in part by these advances, several recent works have focused on the topological properties of two-body states [13,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], with the long-term aim of paving the path to a better comprehension of topological phases in a full many-body interacting scenario. A distinctive advantage that these small-sized systems offer is that it is often possible to map the problem of two interacting particles in a lattice into a single-particle model defined in a different lattice, the topological characterization of which can then be performed with well-established techniques [31][32][33]36,40,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%