The topological approach to social choice was developed by Graciela Chichilnisky in the beginning of the eighties. The main result in this area known as the resolution of the topological social choice paradox shows that a space of preferences admits of a continuous, anonymous, and unanimous aggregation rule for every numb e rof individuals if and only if this space is contractible. Furthermore, connections b e t ween the Pareto principle, dictatorship, and manipulation were established. Recently, Baryshnikov used the topological approach to demonstrate that Arrow's impossibility theorem can b ereformulated in terms of the non-contractibility of spheres. This paper discusses these results in a self-contained way, emphasizes the social choice interpretation of some topological concepts, and surveys the area of topological aggregation. 1