2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1931659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topography of the free-energy landscape probed via mechanical unfolding of proteins

Abstract: Single-molecule experiments in which proteins are unfolded by applying mechanical stretching forces generally force unfolding to proceed along a reaction coordinate that is different from that in chemical or thermal denaturation. Here we simulate the mechanical unfolding and refolding of a minimalist off-lattice model of the protein ubiquitin to explore in detail the slice of the multidimensional free-energy landscape that is accessible via mechanical pulling experiments. We find that while the free-energy pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
7
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32), and ubiquitin (can refold at forces of up to 40 pN) (33). In addition, recent molecular dynamics simulations (41,42) demonstrate that refolding can occur at high forces (Ϸ40 pN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32), and ubiquitin (can refold at forces of up to 40 pN) (33). In addition, recent molecular dynamics simulations (41,42) demonstrate that refolding can occur at high forces (Ϸ40 pN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,65 Fernandez and Li 64 studied the refolding of a multidomain polyubiquitin chain by monitoring the decrease in the overall extension of the chain. As was shown by subsequent theoretical studies, 65,66 the dynamics of the chain extension is similar regardless of whether or not each domain folds independently. This makes differentiating between the cooperative and noncooperative scenarios difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Despite the remarkable success of this model in describing many experimental observations, 12 theoretical studies have highlighted its limitations. [13][14][15][16][17] Recent experimental work has also brought possible shortcomings of this model into a) Email: makarov@cm.utexas.edu spotlight: although its predictions 18,19 seem to fit well the observed distributions of transition path times for biomolecular folding, 3 the barrier height estimates obtained from such fits were inconsistent with the measured potentials of mean force and transition rates, 3 motivating several theoretical proposals to account for this discrepancy. [20][21][22] Perhaps the most straightforward improvement of the one-dimensional diffusion model is to allow the diffusion coefficient to be a coordinate-dependent function D(x) (for a justification of the position dependence of the diffusivity, see the discussion in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%