2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.68955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topography and motion of acid-sensing ion channel intracellular domains

Abstract: Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are trimeric cation-selective channels activated by decreases in extracellular pH. The intracellular N and C terminal tails of ASIC1 influence channel gating, trafficking, and signaling in ischemic cell death. Despite several x-ray and cryo-EM structures of the extracellular and transmembrane segments of ASIC1, these important intracellular tails remain unresolved. Here we describe the coarse topography of the chicken ASIC1 intracellular domains determined by FRET, measured us… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is possible that the conservation of the β11-12 linker, and alterations of the surrounding areas, arose because of the physiological role of SSD rather than the precise timing of ASIC desensitization and recovery kinetics. It is also possible that the kinetics of channel desensitization and recovery are important, however, mainly in the context of slow changes in extracellular pH as have been recently examined ( Alijevic et al, 2020 ) or intracellular conformational changes which might be involved in signaling cascades ( Wang et al, 2015 , 2020 ; Couch et al, 2021 ). Understanding these issues will require a clearer accounting of the spatial-temporal dynamics of pH change in situ as well as introduction of ASICs with biophysically impactful mutations to appreciate the consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is possible that the conservation of the β11-12 linker, and alterations of the surrounding areas, arose because of the physiological role of SSD rather than the precise timing of ASIC desensitization and recovery kinetics. It is also possible that the kinetics of channel desensitization and recovery are important, however, mainly in the context of slow changes in extracellular pH as have been recently examined ( Alijevic et al, 2020 ) or intracellular conformational changes which might be involved in signaling cascades ( Wang et al, 2015 , 2020 ; Couch et al, 2021 ). Understanding these issues will require a clearer accounting of the spatial-temporal dynamics of pH change in situ as well as introduction of ASICs with biophysically impactful mutations to appreciate the consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly, mambalgin-2 can bind to the ASIC1a channels in the closed or desensitized states (26,38) and activate the metabotropic signaling through the channel without the pore opening. In line with this suggestion, it was shown that the intracellular domain of the ASIC channels can interact with different intracellular signaling messengers (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…They found a slow pH dependent decrease in that ratio (Wang et al, 2020). The second study repeated this measurement with FPs that are not sensitive to pH in the pH 6-8 range and found that there was no change in the ratio of acceptor/donor fluorescence with prolonged acidification (Couch et al, 2021). YFP has a pKa of around 6.9 and its fluorescence changes dramatically between pH 7.4 and 6 (Llopis et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not think this is likely the case. First, previous work looking at the interaction between the Nzand C-termini used the same bulky FPs (Couch et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2020). In those experiments there was often an FP on each terminus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%