2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographical surface patterning with block copolymer stamps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the contour of the stamped features is most efficiently adjusted by the size and the shape of the stamps’ contact elements, as demonstrated for porous stamps used to deposit solution‐based inks. [ 60 ] It should also be noted that chemical surface modification, for example by silanes or thiols, to tune the surface wettability of the receiving counterpart substrate might be not feasible in the context of high‐temperature capillary stamping since the surface modification might not be stable at the applied temperatures. Furthermore, we did not find systematic differences in the diameters of P(VDF‐TrFE) microdots stamped on Al‐coated Si wafers (Table S3 and Figure S8, Supporting Information) and on glass substrates (Table S5 and Figure S13, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that the contour of the stamped features is most efficiently adjusted by the size and the shape of the stamps’ contact elements, as demonstrated for porous stamps used to deposit solution‐based inks. [ 60 ] It should also be noted that chemical surface modification, for example by silanes or thiols, to tune the surface wettability of the receiving counterpart substrate might be not feasible in the context of high‐temperature capillary stamping since the surface modification might not be stable at the applied temperatures. Furthermore, we did not find systematic differences in the diameters of P(VDF‐TrFE) microdots stamped on Al‐coated Si wafers (Table S3 and Figure S8, Supporting Information) and on glass substrates (Table S5 and Figure S13, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shapes of the polymer microdots appear to be related to the shape of the protruding contact elements of the polymer/npAu composite stamps. As it is commonly the case for stamp‐based contact‐lithographic methods, the main lever to modify the contours of the deposited features would be a correspondingly modified topography of the contact surfaces of the stamps (for porous stamps see, for example, Guo and Steinhart [ 60 ] ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%