1985
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902360103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographical projections of the cerebral cortex to the subthalamic nucleus

Abstract: Corticosubthalamic projections in the rat were investigated using the autoradiographic anterograde axonal tracing technique. After unilateral injections of tritiated amino acids in the cerebral cortex, projections to the ipsilateral subthalamic nucleus (STH) could be found arising only from the frontal agranular cortex and the zone of MI-SI overlap. Injections into granular areas of the cortex (e.g., somatosensory and visual areas) did not result in labeling in STH. Following injections in the frontal agranula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this hypothesis implies that dopamine receptors in the STN exert an inhibitory effect on STN neuronal activity, which is at odds with results from this laboratory that demonstrate that locally infused dopaminergic agonists excite STN neurons in the intact rat . Another factor that could contribute to the increased activity of STN neurons in the lesioned rat is an enhancement of excitatory input (Overton and Greenfield, 1995;Hassani et al, 1996), putatively from the cortex that is a major source of glutamatergic afferents (Afsharpour, 1985;Rouzaire-Dubois and Scarnati, 1987;Canteras et al, 1990). Observations that stimulation of cortical neurons increased bursting activity (Kitai and Deniau, 1981;Fujimoto and Kita, 1993) and c-fos expression in the STN (Wan et al, 1992) are supportive of this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this hypothesis implies that dopamine receptors in the STN exert an inhibitory effect on STN neuronal activity, which is at odds with results from this laboratory that demonstrate that locally infused dopaminergic agonists excite STN neurons in the intact rat . Another factor that could contribute to the increased activity of STN neurons in the lesioned rat is an enhancement of excitatory input (Overton and Greenfield, 1995;Hassani et al, 1996), putatively from the cortex that is a major source of glutamatergic afferents (Afsharpour, 1985;Rouzaire-Dubois and Scarnati, 1987;Canteras et al, 1990). Observations that stimulation of cortical neurons increased bursting activity (Kitai and Deniau, 1981;Fujimoto and Kita, 1993) and c-fos expression in the STN (Wan et al, 1992) are supportive of this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for these unpredicted observations is that dopamine receptor stimulation at extrastriatal sites predominately influences the STN. For instance, the STN is modulated by afferents from cortical areas (Afsharpour, 1985;Campbell et al, 1985;Canteras et al, 1990) that are innervated by midbrain dopamine cells (Björklund and Lindvall, 1984;Descarries et al, 1987;Van Eden et al, 1987). In addition, the STN itself receives direct input from dopamine neurons (Meibach and Katzman, 1979;Campbell et al, 1985;Canteras et al, 1990;Hassani et al, 1997).…”
Section: Analysis; Firing Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetries observed in the motor cortex were the same in both control and experimental groups, reflecting a non specific effect of the electrode that passes through the same structures in all stimulated and sham operated animals. Given the well established ros trocortical projections to the STH (Afsharpour, 1985;Rouzaire-Dubois and Scarnati, 1985;Can teras et aI., 1988;Ryan and Clark, 1991), the failure …”
Section: Effects Elicited In Motor Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the cerebral cortex (Hartmann-Von Monakow et ai., 1978;Romansky et ai., 1979;Kitai and Deniau, 1981;Afsharpour 1985;Rouzaire-Dubois and Scar nati, 1985;Canteras et ai., 1988). It also receives moderate projections from the parafascicular tha lamic nucleus (Sugimoto et ai., 1983;Canteras et ai., 1990;Groenewegen and Berendse, 1990) and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (Nomura et ai.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STN neurons integrate powerful monosynaptic glutamatergic inputs originating from corticosubthalamic (CSth) neurons and relay these excitatory signals to the SNr and the globus pallidus (GP) (Deniau et al, 1978;Van Der Kooy and Hattori, 1980;Kitai and Deniau, 1981;Afsharpour, 1985;Rouzaire-Dubois and Scarnati, 1987;Maurice et al, 1998;Magill et al, 2000). GABAergic neurons of the GP shape the activity of STN neurons by a disinhibitory mechanism involving corticostriatal and striatopallidal pathways (Maurice et al, 1998;Bevan et al, 2002b) and via reciprocal connections with the STN Bevan et al, 2002b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%