2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1511-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographical Influences on the Spatial Distribution of Soil Mercury at the Catchment Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, THg concentrations in surface soils in the TNFP were comparable to mercury levels from other forest soils in China (Lin et al, 2012;Fu et al, 2010a;Liu et al, 2003). But THg concentrations in the soils of our study area were slight lower than THg levels from some remote areas of Eastern Europe which were generally more than 200 ng g À1 for organic layers, primarily due to much higher atmospheric deposition to the forest (Szopka et al, 2011;Gunda and Scanlon, 2013;Navr atil et al, 2014). However, THg concentrations in surface soils and litter in the study area were much higher (1.5e2.0 folders higher) than those observed in mountain areas of North America and northeastern China, which were generally less than 150 ng g À1 for surface soils and 100 ng g À1 for litterfall (Larssen et al, 2008;Juillerat et al, 2012;Tabatchnick, 2012;Luo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Thg Concentrations In Litter and Soilssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, THg concentrations in surface soils in the TNFP were comparable to mercury levels from other forest soils in China (Lin et al, 2012;Fu et al, 2010a;Liu et al, 2003). But THg concentrations in the soils of our study area were slight lower than THg levels from some remote areas of Eastern Europe which were generally more than 200 ng g À1 for organic layers, primarily due to much higher atmospheric deposition to the forest (Szopka et al, 2011;Gunda and Scanlon, 2013;Navr atil et al, 2014). However, THg concentrations in surface soils and litter in the study area were much higher (1.5e2.0 folders higher) than those observed in mountain areas of North America and northeastern China, which were generally less than 150 ng g À1 for surface soils and 100 ng g À1 for litterfall (Larssen et al, 2008;Juillerat et al, 2012;Tabatchnick, 2012;Luo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Thg Concentrations In Litter and Soilssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…High values of standard deviation (SD) and variability coefficient proved a high diversity of THg concentrations, particularly in the organic soil layers. Higher THg concentrations in the organic layer compared to forest litter result partly from natural processes of litterfall decomposition and transformation, in which organic matter binding mercury compounds are usually more stabilized via complexing, humification and adsorption to clay minerals (Schlüter, 2000; Gunda and Scanlon, 2013). This result was consistent well with observations reported by other studies which stressed the affinity of atmospheric mercury to accumulate in the surface layers of soils Pena-Rodriguez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Thg Concentrations In Litter and Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The combination of strong precipitation gradients and increased THg concentration with SWE leads to large spatial variability in the total snowpack Hg pools in mountainous areas. A previous study noted relationships between soil Hg content and elevation (Gunda and Scanlon, 2013), possibly attributable to precipitation gradients, while another study found that soil Hg storage was positively correlated with total precipitation across multiple study sites but attributed these effects to ecological processes such as increased plant productivity and carbon accumulation (Obrist et al, 2009.…”
Section: Mercurymentioning
confidence: 96%