1998
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-64381-8_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographic maps automatic interpretation : Some proposed strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, a scan density of 508 dpi (50 µm spacing) is used. This value has been proven to be sufficient for the automatic interpretation of digitized topographic maps [34,35]. After the topographic maps are scanned and georeferenced at a scale of 1:25,000, a pixel corresponds to an area of 1.25 by 1.25 m in nature.…”
Section: Pre-processing Of the Topographic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a scan density of 508 dpi (50 µm spacing) is used. This value has been proven to be sufficient for the automatic interpretation of digitized topographic maps [34,35]. After the topographic maps are scanned and georeferenced at a scale of 1:25,000, a pixel corresponds to an area of 1.25 by 1.25 m in nature.…”
Section: Pre-processing Of the Topographic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lichtner (1985) suggested pattern recognition by raster to vector transformation. Deseilligny et al (1998) performed text recognition and extracted information from the French national topographic maps and Li (1999) used the US Geological Survey (USGS) maps for similar work. Guerin and Deseilligny (1995) proposed automated digitization and interpretation of scanned maps using spatial associations so as to completely extract and make a list of important geographical objects to improve GIS analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This knowledge is either directly written into in the source code, or it can be declarative knowledge based on explicit rules for graphical entities. An analysis of graphical entities and their relationships allows one to propose an interpretation, in the case of strictly bottom-up approaches such as [Boatto 1992], [Deseilligny 1998], [Kasturi 1990], [Shimotsuji 1992], [Suzuki 1990]. The main difficulty in this kind of process comes from obtaining significant and robust graphical entities from the low-level operators and reliable association rules between each primitive in order to achieve a correct interpretation.…”
Section: Classical Strategies : Bottom-up Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%