“…In the subgroup analysis of the 21 cadaveric studies only (n = 1250 hands) [ 2 , 3 , 8 , 9 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 26 – 29 , 31 – 37 ], the pooled prevalence of extraligamenous ( Fig 4A ), subligamentous ( Fig 4B ), and transligamentous ( Fig 4C ) types were 76.4% (95% CI: 63.9%- 81.1%), 11.4% (95% CI: 5.5%- 7.7%), and 12.2% (95% CI: 6.1%- 18.6%), respectively (Cochran's Q, p = 0.000; I 2 = 91.2%, 95% CI: 88.0%- 93.6%). In the subgroup analysis of the 6 intraoperative studies (n = 2256) [ 6 , 7 , 10 , 20 , 22 , 37 ], the pooled prevalence of extraligamenous ( Fig 5A ), subligamentous ( Fig 5B ), and transligamentous ( Fig 5C ) types were 66.8% (95% CI: 21.0%- 100%), 24.5% (95% CI: 0%- 65.8%), and 8.7% (95% CI: 0%- 40.9%), respectively (Cochran's Q, p = 0.000; I 2 = 99.6%; 95% CI: 99.5%- 99.7%).…”