2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015jb012407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographic effects on coseismic gravity change for the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake and comparison with GRACE

Abstract: We estimate gravity changes due to coseismic horizontal deformation and inclined bathymetry (referred to as topographic effects in this study) associated with the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake, using a layered half‐space dislocation model. As an approximation, we represent inclined topography with ramp‐body models in the near field of the earthquake and calculate topographic effects from both an inclined seafloor and Moho. The Moho effect partly compensates that from the seafloor. An additional contribution comes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9b shows the time series of selected points near Japan with peak-to-peak a range of −1.3~0.2 µGal. According to the residual RMS distribution, the hydrological signal level is around 0.4 µGal, which is consistent with Li et al [42]. Figure 9c,d shows the time series of selected points and RMS variations in Chile and Peru, with the amplitude in the range of −2.6~+3.6 and −8.1~+3.5 µGal, respectively, in which the amplitude variation of the hydrological signal is generally larger than those of Sumatra and Japan.…”
Section: Influence Of Hydrological Signalssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 9b shows the time series of selected points near Japan with peak-to-peak a range of −1.3~0.2 µGal. According to the residual RMS distribution, the hydrological signal level is around 0.4 µGal, which is consistent with Li et al [42]. Figure 9c,d shows the time series of selected points and RMS variations in Chile and Peru, with the amplitude in the range of −2.6~+3.6 and −8.1~+3.5 µGal, respectively, in which the amplitude variation of the hydrological signal is generally larger than those of Sumatra and Japan.…”
Section: Influence Of Hydrological Signalssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Also, horizontal movements of slant surfaces bring similar effects to the surfaces elevations ( Fig. 1c), which, however, are often relatively small (Li et al 2016). Secondly, post-seismic gravity changes are supposed to result from the afterslip, visco-elastic relaxation, and poro-elastic rebound of the upper mantle.…”
Section: The Mechanisms Of the Gravity Field And Geoid Height Changesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, de Linage et al [35] shows that with a non-linear optimization method, the range of the estimated post-seismic parameter τ for the December 2004 Mw9.1 earthquake is 0.5-0.75 year (i.e., 6-9 months) in the region surrounding the epicenter. Li et al [42] applies a residual minimization standard of the observations and indicates that the value of post-seismic parameter τ for the March 2011 Mw9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake is around 0.32 year (i.e., 4 months). Therefore, in this study we used τ = 7 and τ = 4 months to fit the post-seismic terms for the Sumatra and Tohoku-Oki earthquake regions, respectively.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimate Of Seismic Impact On the Gmom Change Ratementioning
confidence: 99%