Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2006.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topochemical approach of kinetics of the reduction of hematite to wüstite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ea of each step from both macrokinetics and microkinetics have been calculated by many investigators. [21][22][23][24][25] The typical ranges of Ea of different rate controlling steps have been summarized by Strangway.…”
Section: Reduction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ea of each step from both macrokinetics and microkinetics have been calculated by many investigators. [21][22][23][24][25] The typical ranges of Ea of different rate controlling steps have been summarized by Strangway.…”
Section: Reduction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. The correlation coefficients were used elsewhere, 18,25) which was helpful in judging the linear relationship of lines. It was found that the kinetic plots of chemical control at the three temperatures have the best linear relationship compared to gaseous diffusion control and mixed control.…”
Section: Kinetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clearly visible that the experimental data do not exactly coincide with the theoretical predicted values. This is because this kinetic model only applies to the surface reaction of the hematite particles, without considering the influence of mass or heat transfer resistances during the reaction process [15]. However, the mass and heating transfer resistances occur, induced by the gradually thicker magnetite layer during the fluidized reduction process of hematite, and lead to a deviationbetween the experimental data and the theoretical predicted values.…”
Section: Determination Of the Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Eventually, the original hematite particles were completely transformed into magnetite particles with a porous structure (Figure 10c). As mentioned above, the reduction process of hematite to magnetite may be theoretically divided into three periods, namely, an induction period (0 < α < 0.15), an acceleratory period (0.15 < α < 0.50), and a deceleratory period (0.5 < α < 1) [15,28]. In the initial induction period, the fresh microcracks were formed as a result of normal swelling due to the crystal structure difference between the starting hematite (hexagonal closed-packed) and the newly formed magnetite (cubic spinal).…”
Section: Microstructure Changes After Reduction Roastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When iron oxide is reduced by acetylene gas, the reduced iron contains many transient vacancies and defects after losing oxygen atoms through topochemical reactions. 24,31 At that time, excess carbon can penetrate into the vacancies and defects in the reduced iron. Carbon then precipitates from inside the iron, causing it to break as time progresses.…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%