2020
DOI: 10.1159/000508334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical Vitamin D Receptor Antagonist/Partial-Agonist Treatment Induces Epidermal Hyperproliferation via RARγ Signaling Pathways

Abstract: Vitamin D and A derivatives are well-known endogenous substances responsible for skin homeostasis. In this study we topically treated shaved mouse skin with a vitamin D agonist (MC903) or vitamin D antagonist/partial agonist (ZK159222) and compared the changes with acetone (control treatment) treatment for 14 days. Topical treatment with ZK159222 resulted in increased expression of genes involved in retinoic acid synthesis, increased retinoic acid concentrations and increased expression of retinoid target gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that the increased levels of these bioactive derivatives and thereby further active VDR-RXR-mediated signalling may correlate well with clinical AD markers [54]. These data suggest that the negative correlation of 25(OH)D 3 plasma levels with clinical AD markers might just indicate reduced plasma levels of 25(OH)D 3 due to an increased metabolism towards 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 and further pro-allergic signalling [26-30]. In consequence, a supplementation with additional vitamin D might be likely detrimental as displayed in studies performing vitamin D supplementations to allergy and AD patients [16-18] and the consequence that an additional vitamin D supplementation might result in a simple maintenance or even an aggravation of the chronic AD status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest that the increased levels of these bioactive derivatives and thereby further active VDR-RXR-mediated signalling may correlate well with clinical AD markers [54]. These data suggest that the negative correlation of 25(OH)D 3 plasma levels with clinical AD markers might just indicate reduced plasma levels of 25(OH)D 3 due to an increased metabolism towards 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 and further pro-allergic signalling [26-30]. In consequence, a supplementation with additional vitamin D might be likely detrimental as displayed in studies performing vitamin D supplementations to allergy and AD patients [16-18] and the consequence that an additional vitamin D supplementation might result in a simple maintenance or even an aggravation of the chronic AD status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversies exist also when focusing on mice. Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-deficient mice obtain an increased transepidermal water-loss and barrier properties [25], while topical VDR-ligand (MC903) treatments are widely used and accepted models to study atopic like changes in mice [26][27][28][29][30]. In opposite, systemic treatments were shown to improve allergen-triggered eczema in a mouse model [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116 Furthermore, the induction of epidermal hyperproliferation in mouse skin by VDR antagonists occurs through the enhanced activation of RARγ mediated pathways (Figure 3F). 117…”
Section: The Interaction Between Nrsmentioning
confidence: 99%