Abstract:ABSTRACT.Background: To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. Methods: The unicentre, prospective, randomized, clinical interventional trial included 140 consecutive patients undergoing routine cataract surgery performed by one of two surgeons. The patients were randomly distributed to either peribulbar anaesthesia or topical anaesthesia. To assess intraoperative pain, each patient was asked immediately after surgery… Show more
“…[8][9][10] Topical anaesthesia confers the advantages of relatively faster visual recovery and higher patient satisfaction, easy application, minimal discomfort on administration, rapid onset of anaesthesia, and lower cost. 5,[11][12][13] However, the use of a topical anaesthetic permits the patient's full ocular movement during surgery, requires patient compliance, and may involve the administration of supplemental anaesthesia. 5,12 Unpreserved lidocaine is the most frequently used and safest agent in topical anaesthesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[11][12][13] However, the use of a topical anaesthetic permits the patient's full ocular movement during surgery, requires patient compliance, and may involve the administration of supplemental anaesthesia. 5,12 Unpreserved lidocaine is the most frequently used and safest agent in topical anaesthesia. Because of the shortacting effect, intraoperative and/or postoperative pain, and dissatisfaction may be associated with the use of topical lidocaine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now a widely accepted procedure and has become a wellestablished technique in phacoemulsification surgery as an alternative to the retrobulbar and peribulbar techniques. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Because it is less invasive, reducing the risk of complications and eliminating complications from needle and systemic toxicity, topical anaesthesia has gained popularity among surgeons. [8][9][10] Topical anaesthesia confers the advantages of relatively faster visual recovery and higher patient satisfaction, easy application, minimal discomfort on administration, rapid onset of anaesthesia, and lower cost.…”
Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of topical lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. Methods One hundred and five patients scheduled for cataract surgery with topical anaesthesia were randomly allocated into 3 groups of 35 patients each to receive eye drops of lidocaine 2%, levobupivacaine 0.75%, or ropivacaine 1% every 5 min starting 30 min before surgery. Patients graded their pain using a 0-10-point verbal pain score (VPS) at different stages of the procedure. The levels of patient and surgeon satisfaction, the duration of surgery, complications, and the need for supplemental anaesthesia were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in duration of surgery and demographic variables among the groups. At the intraoperative period, end of surgery, and postoperative first hour the mean VPS in the lidocaine group was significantly higher than the others (Po0.01), but no significant difference was found between the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups. At incision and 24 h after surgery, it was not significantly different among the groups. Surgeon and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups than in the lidocaine group (Po0.01).Conclusions Topical anaesthesia with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine were safe, feasible and more effective than lidocaine in cataract surgery. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine provided sufficient and long-lasting analgesia without the need of supplemental anaesthesia for each patient.
“…[8][9][10] Topical anaesthesia confers the advantages of relatively faster visual recovery and higher patient satisfaction, easy application, minimal discomfort on administration, rapid onset of anaesthesia, and lower cost. 5,[11][12][13] However, the use of a topical anaesthetic permits the patient's full ocular movement during surgery, requires patient compliance, and may involve the administration of supplemental anaesthesia. 5,12 Unpreserved lidocaine is the most frequently used and safest agent in topical anaesthesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[11][12][13] However, the use of a topical anaesthetic permits the patient's full ocular movement during surgery, requires patient compliance, and may involve the administration of supplemental anaesthesia. 5,12 Unpreserved lidocaine is the most frequently used and safest agent in topical anaesthesia. Because of the shortacting effect, intraoperative and/or postoperative pain, and dissatisfaction may be associated with the use of topical lidocaine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now a widely accepted procedure and has become a wellestablished technique in phacoemulsification surgery as an alternative to the retrobulbar and peribulbar techniques. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Because it is less invasive, reducing the risk of complications and eliminating complications from needle and systemic toxicity, topical anaesthesia has gained popularity among surgeons. [8][9][10] Topical anaesthesia confers the advantages of relatively faster visual recovery and higher patient satisfaction, easy application, minimal discomfort on administration, rapid onset of anaesthesia, and lower cost.…”
Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of topical lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. Methods One hundred and five patients scheduled for cataract surgery with topical anaesthesia were randomly allocated into 3 groups of 35 patients each to receive eye drops of lidocaine 2%, levobupivacaine 0.75%, or ropivacaine 1% every 5 min starting 30 min before surgery. Patients graded their pain using a 0-10-point verbal pain score (VPS) at different stages of the procedure. The levels of patient and surgeon satisfaction, the duration of surgery, complications, and the need for supplemental anaesthesia were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in duration of surgery and demographic variables among the groups. At the intraoperative period, end of surgery, and postoperative first hour the mean VPS in the lidocaine group was significantly higher than the others (Po0.01), but no significant difference was found between the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups. At incision and 24 h after surgery, it was not significantly different among the groups. Surgeon and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups than in the lidocaine group (Po0.01).Conclusions Topical anaesthesia with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine were safe, feasible and more effective than lidocaine in cataract surgery. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine provided sufficient and long-lasting analgesia without the need of supplemental anaesthesia for each patient.
“…They also concluded that as topical anesthesia is less invasive than peribulbar anesthesia, patients may require less intraoperative and postoperative monitoring with topical anesthesia than with peribulbar anesthesia. 21 There was no difference in visual acuity in the two groups after six weeks. They reported that visual rehabilitation in the postoperative period is faster with topical anesthesia, as it allows patients to see just after surgery, whereas the optic nerve and extraocular muscles may still be partially blocked by local anesthetics in patients who have undergone cataract surgery with peribulbar anesthesia.…”
AIM:To compare efficacy and safety in terms of pain, surgical complications and visual outcome of topical anesthesia with peribulbar anesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation. DESIGN: Prospective Clinical Study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 cataract patients underwent MSICS with PCIOL. 140 patients received peribulbar anesthesia and 140 patients received topical anesthesia. The two groups were compared regarding efficacy and safety in terms of pain, surgical complications and visual outcome. RESULTS: We observed that mean pain during administration of peribulbar anesthesia was 3.57 (SD ± 1.49) and with topical anesthesia was 2.32 (SD ± 1.19). The mean pain during surgery with peribulbar anesthesia was 1.87 (SD ± 1.40) and with topical anesthesia was 2.24 (SD ± 1.13). Chemosis and subconjunctival hemorrhage were not seen with topical anesthesia whereas akinesia is mainly a problem with topical anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed that topical anesthesia is comparable to peribulbar anesthesia and is recommended as a safe and effective alternative to peribulbar anesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
“…Nevertheless, it is important that all conditions be evaluated prior to operation in older individuals with risk factors. Topical anaesthesia is very useful for outpatients and leads to fewer post-surgical complications (21), and previous studies have described the efficacy of topical anaesthesia in outpatient operations, even when performed by residents (22)(23)(24). Koolwijk et al (25) reported that outpatient cataract surgery is easy and safe with topical anaesthesia, with minimal complications.…”
This study aimed to determine the trends in outpatient cataract surgery and its determinants in the Islamic Republic of Iran between 2006 and 2010. In this cross-sectional study, 106 cataract surgery centres were selected in all provinces by multistage randomized cluster sampling. The number of centres in each province was determined from the number of cataract operations and the number of patient charts examined in each centre was proportionate to the number of cataract operations in that centre. The prevalence of outpatient surgery increased from 46.0% (95% CI, 35.3-56.8) in 2006 to 51.4% (95% CI, 40.2-62.7) in 2010 (P = 0.549). Patients stayed in hospital for more than one night after 10.5% (95% CI, 6.9-14.1) of operations. Use of phacoemulsification and topical anaesthesia increased the prevalence of outpatient surgery and decreased intraoperative complications. Although outpatient cataract surgery increased by 11.7%, use of methods such as phacoemulsification is not widespread, and more attention should be paid to the barriers to outpatient cataract surgery in the Islamic Republic of Iran. . Les patients sont restés plus d'une nuit à l'hôpital après 10,5 % (IC à 95 %, 6,9-14,1) des opérations. Le recours à la phaco-émulsification et l'anesthésie topique faisait augmenter la prévalence de la chirurgie ambulatoire et réduisait les complications intra-opératoires. Bien que la chirurgie de la cataracte en ambulatoire ait augmenté de 11,7 %, l'utilisation de méthodes telles que la phaco-émusification n'est pas répandue, et davantage d'attention devrait être apportée aux obstacles qui s'opposent à la chirurgie de la cataracte en ambulatoire en République islamique d'Iran.
2010-املتوسط لرشق الصحية املجلة العرشون و الثاين املجلد التاسع العدد 677
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.