2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(01)00268-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical treatment of digital dermatitis associated with severe heel-horn erosion in a Swedish dairy herd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
91
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual topical treatments using disinfectants were adopted less often than those using antibiotics, mainly because they were considered to be less effective in healing lesions. These observations also agree fairly well with numerous studies (Hernandez et al, 1999;Manske et al, 2002). A recent study reported good effectiveness for Hoof-Fit Gel R , one of the products tried by the farmers (Holzhauer et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Individual topical treatments using disinfectants were adopted less often than those using antibiotics, mainly because they were considered to be less effective in healing lesions. These observations also agree fairly well with numerous studies (Hernandez et al, 1999;Manske et al, 2002). A recent study reported good effectiveness for Hoof-Fit Gel R , one of the products tried by the farmers (Holzhauer et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…DD 118 lesions were recorded on 12 occasions in two herds and on 11 occasions in one herd with a mean 119 interval of 6.9 days (SD = 1.06; range 5 -9) between observations. The DD lesions were scoredusing an ordinal scale described by Manske et al (2002) (Table 2). Only lesions in the skin in the 121 heel region of the hind feet were scored and if more than one lesion was present the most 122 predominant lesion on a foot was recorded.…”
Section: Observations 117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations were done by BHN, PTT or a trained 123 research technician from Aarhus University. All observers were highly trained and experienced in 124 the use of the scoring system presented by Manske et al (2002). Before starting the observations, 125 the three observers were calibrated by looking at pictures of DD lesions and discussing the DD 126 scoring system in order to obtain a high degree of agreement.…”
Section: Observations 117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cows more than 150 days after parturition were used in order to exclude the influence of parturition, and the animals were divided into two groups; 18 cows (DD group) had DD on both hind legs, and 12 cows (control group) had four legs with no clinical abnormalities ( Table 1). All cows were diagnosed in a hoof trimming chute, and DD was defined as scores 1-3 using the scoring system developed by Manske [9]. BCSs were calculated according to previously reported methods [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%