1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb04660.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical lignocaine and thiopentone for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous investigation showed that topical lignocaine spray prior to intravenous thiopentone allows placement of a LMA with as few complications as following a dose of propofol [6]. The technique was associated with cost savings, as well as greater cardiorespiratory stability, than induction and insertion with propofol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previous investigation showed that topical lignocaine spray prior to intravenous thiopentone allows placement of a LMA with as few complications as following a dose of propofol [6]. The technique was associated with cost savings, as well as greater cardiorespiratory stability, than induction and insertion with propofol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study we demonstrated that conditions for LMA insertion when thiopentone is preceded by topical lignocaine spray match those seen with propofol [6]. Lignocaine given intravenously may improve the conditions for LMA insertion when propofol is used [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Our results suggested that propofol caused more cardiovascular depression than thiopentone. C.R.Seavell et al [10] conducted a study and assessed conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in 90 patients, who received either thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 preceded by 40 mg of topical lignocaine spray to the posterior pharyngeal wall or propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 alone, and concluded that thiopentone preceded by topical lignocaine spray provides conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask equal to those of propofol, with more hemodynamic stability. Kumar R et al in 2012 [11] conducted a comparative study between propofol and thiopentone with lignocaine spray for laryngeal mask airway insertion, and concluded that thiopentone preceded by lignocaine spray provided equal condition as of propofol for insertion of LMA with more hemodynamic stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8] [10] T.M.Cook et al [12] conducted a study in which conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in 90 unpremedicated adult patients were assessed in a randomized, single-blinded trial, The group receiving topical lignocaine had a lower incidence of laryngospasm (p < 0.05), required fewer attempts for successful insertion of the laryngeal mask (p < 0.05) and coughed or gagged less frequently than group receiving lignocaine intravenously (p > 0.05). Overall, the conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion were better in the topical group (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In the setting of day care anaesthesia with its emphasis on early ambulation, newer induction agent propofol with its short elimination 9 and rapid clearance was introduced. Comparison has therefore been made between propofol and other induction agents including sodium thiopentone for insertion of Proseal LMA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%