2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007693.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children

Abstract: BackgroundFor many years, topical use of fluorides has gained greater popularity than systemic use of fluorides. A possible adverse effect associated with the use of topical fluoride is the development of dental fluorosis due to the ingestion of excessive fluoride by young children with developing teeth. ObjectivesTo describe the relationship between the use of topical fluorides in young children and the risk of developing dental fluorosis. Search strategyElectronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group Tri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
2
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
87
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…There is less of a concern about professionally applied topical fluorides for which there are longer intervals between applications. 94 Fluoride varnish dispensed in unit doses has lower potential for harm than do other forms of high-concentration topical fluoride agents, because the amount of fluoride that is placed in the mouth by means of fluoride varnish is approximately one-tenth that of other professionally applied products. 95 …”
Section: General Remarks On Clinical Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is less of a concern about professionally applied topical fluorides for which there are longer intervals between applications. 94 Fluoride varnish dispensed in unit doses has lower potential for harm than do other forms of high-concentration topical fluoride agents, because the amount of fluoride that is placed in the mouth by means of fluoride varnish is approximately one-tenth that of other professionally applied products. 95 …”
Section: General Remarks On Clinical Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the majority of our responders recommended the start of tooth-brushing and the use of toothpaste after the 1st birthday. Pediatricians and dentists are in agreement that young children swallow the majority of toothpaste until they can spit out and that it is necessary to limit the consumption of toothpaste with dose recommendations [1-5,13,20-22]. Additionally, parents should assist and supervise tooth-brushing [3-5,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatricians and dentists are in agreement that young children swallow the majority of toothpaste until they can spit out and that it is necessary to limit the consumption of toothpaste with dose recommendations [1-5,13,20-22]. Additionally, parents should assist and supervise tooth-brushing [3-5,21,22]. The AAPD recommends that children less than 2 years of age should use a smear layer of fluoride toothpaste (≥1000 ppm) twice a day, and children up to 5 years of age should use a pea-sized amount [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that fluorosis risk is related to an elevated fluoride intake for all of the first 3 years of life, 46 but that the first 2 years of life are the period with greatest risk. 47 A Cochrane review 48 that assessed fluorosis risk associated with use of fluoride-containing toothpaste in early childhood included 25 studies of different designs. There was weak, unreliable evidence that brushing a child's teeth with a toothpaste containing fluoride, before the age of 12 months, may be associated with an increased risk of developing mild fluorosis.…”
Section: Fluorosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a small number of ARs with a possible link to the varnish; all of these were minor in nature and self-limiting, which suggests that fluoride-containing varnish in this young age group is safe. There is a potential increased risk of fluorosis, 48 which will only be apparent when the permanent incisor teeth erupt at 8-9 years of age and, therefore, assessment of this outcome is outside the scope of the trial reported here.…”
Section: A 2003 Cochrane Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%