2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04751.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical corticosteroid therapy for acute radiation dermatitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

Abstract: We provide evidence that prophylactic and ongoing use of topical therapy with either topical corticosteroid or a dexpanthenol-containing emollient ameliorates, but does not prevent radiation dermatitis. Our data suggest, but do not prove, a benefit of a topical corticosteroid vs. a dexpanthenol-containing emollient. Further controlled studies with larger cohorts will be needed to determine optimal forms of topical therapy for radiation dermatitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
145
2
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(57 reference statements)
5
145
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Skin reactions were often assessed by one evaluator, which was commonly a radiation oncologist, dermatologist, research nurse, research assistant, radiation therapist, principal investigator, or other medical professional 3,17,20,21,24,26,27,32,33,35,39,44,46,50 . A few studies incorporated an inter-rater reliability measure by having more than one evaluator assess the skin reactions 23,34,36,45,49,51 ; the remaining studies did not describe who assessed the radiated area or areas 2,16,19,25,28,30,31,38,[41][42][43]47,48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Skin reactions were often assessed by one evaluator, which was commonly a radiation oncologist, dermatologist, research nurse, research assistant, radiation therapist, principal investigator, or other medical professional 3,17,20,21,24,26,27,32,33,35,39,44,46,50 . A few studies incorporated an inter-rater reliability measure by having more than one evaluator assess the skin reactions 23,34,36,45,49,51 ; the remaining studies did not describe who assessed the radiated area or areas 2,16,19,25,28,30,31,38,[41][42][43]47,48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second most common tool in use was the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria (nci ctc), which is similar to the rtog and was used in nine studies 2,3,26,28,30,[37][38][39]46 . The remaining studies used a study-designed tool closely modeled after either the rtog or nci tool, with slight variations [18][19][20]23,31,43,49 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations