2005
DOI: 10.1038/436192a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top predators and biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
176
2
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
176
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Top predators can drive diversification of prey 20,21 and help maintain biodiversity 22 . It is typically assumed that apex predators display little phenotypic variation, but there is emerging evidence for rich phenotypic diversity and ecotype formation of predators at the top of multiple food webs 23,24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Top predators can drive diversification of prey 20,21 and help maintain biodiversity 22 . It is typically assumed that apex predators display little phenotypic variation, but there is emerging evidence for rich phenotypic diversity and ecotype formation of predators at the top of multiple food webs 23,24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the relatively high abundance of owls in the xerophytic ecosystem (67% of our sampled locations) should be further investigated owing to the potential role of top predators as reliable indicators of biodiversity values. In fact, solid evidence exists of the association between apex predators that belong to higher trophic levels and habitat complexity, community richness and biodiversity levels (Sergio et al 2004;Sergio et al 2005, Sergio et al 2006. Specifically, this latter relationship has been successfully tested for Glaucidium passerinum, the European counterpart of the Ferruginous Pygmy Owl, providing clear evidence of general patterns of association between charismatic top predators and biodiversity (Sergio et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reserve design should not consider only the current occupied habitat of a species, but also should take into account the potential suitable habitat for it. Although a criticized strategy (Andelman and Fagan 2000;Kerr 1997), top-predators like raptors and charismatic vertebrates have been used for protected areas planning (Carroll et al 2001;Murphy and Noon 1992) and recently, tested as adequate surrogates for conservation (Sergio et al 2005(Sergio et al , 2006. In this paper we propose to design protected areas, previously determining the potential habitat of the target species based on a previous GIS-based habitat selection analysis and, after that, evaluating how eVective is the current network of SPAs in relation to the protection of high potential habitat for the species (the GAP analysis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%