2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03573-9_72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-k Queries with Contextual Fuzzy Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we refer the interested reader to the following works which are not the source papers on the above types of queries but consider them in a fuzzy/possibilistic setting: [13,32,35,72,74,82,94,95,99,105].…”
Section: Tools and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we refer the interested reader to the following works which are not the source papers on the above types of queries but consider them in a fuzzy/possibilistic setting: [13,32,35,72,74,82,94,95,99,105].…”
Section: Tools and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us mention that in a work by Bosc et al 28 the term context, which is not related at all to the user context, is used for defining the fuzzy terms "high", "medium" and "low" in a relative way, using the minimal, average and maximal values of the attribute values present in the associated query-defined context. In this work, the context means a referential of values obtained by evaluating a (sub)query over the target database.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%