2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0953-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-down control in a detritus-based food web: fish, shredders, and leaf breakdown

Abstract: We tested the hypothesis that fish decrease shredder abundance in leaf packs, thereby reducing leaf breakdown rates. Our goal was to test for the occurrence of a trophic cascade in a detritus-based food web. Willow leaves (Salix spp.) were fastened into leaf packs and placed into cages (13×13×13 cm) in Valley Creek, Minnesota, USA. Fish were excluded from leaf packs that were placed in cages with mesh on all sides, whereas open control cages allowed fish access to leaf packs. We collected leaf packs from two r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
5
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
76
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This weak top-down control is likely due to the abundance of morphologically predator-resistant invertebrates in this tributary stream food web (McNeely et al 2007), with approximately 65% of the total benthic invertebrate biomass and 82% of herbivore biomass classified as armored and invulnerable to predation. Though predatory fishes have also been shown to induce trophic cascades on detrital processing rates (Konishi et al 2001, Boyero et al 2007,, but see Ruetz et al 2002), we did not estimate changes in the processing of terrestrial detritus as part of this study. We expect that the processing rates by aquatic invertebrates may be similarly insensitive to top-down control in our study system due to the high abundance of armored taxa within shredder and scraper functional feeding groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This weak top-down control is likely due to the abundance of morphologically predator-resistant invertebrates in this tributary stream food web (McNeely et al 2007), with approximately 65% of the total benthic invertebrate biomass and 82% of herbivore biomass classified as armored and invulnerable to predation. Though predatory fishes have also been shown to induce trophic cascades on detrital processing rates (Konishi et al 2001, Boyero et al 2007,, but see Ruetz et al 2002), we did not estimate changes in the processing of terrestrial detritus as part of this study. We expect that the processing rates by aquatic invertebrates may be similarly insensitive to top-down control in our study system due to the high abundance of armored taxa within shredder and scraper functional feeding groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Twelve cages (1 Â 1 Â 0.5 m 3 ) with 6-mm mesh on all sides were used to manipulate round goby density. The mesh size was sufficient for the movement of invertebrate prey in and out of cages (e.g., Ruetz et al 2002), while acting as a barrier to round gobies ! 3.8 cm TL.…”
Section: Enclosure Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ enclosure and exclosure experiments are a practical way to identify strong interspecific interactions (Power 1992;Ruetz et al 2002;Bartsch et al 2005). First, we used in situ enclosures to examine the direct predatory role of large round gobies on Dreissena densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource availability (e.g., Wallace et al 1997, Cross et al 2006 or physical habitat (Huryn andWallace 1987, Chadwick andHuryn 2005) can control secondary production. Yet, the potential for control of secondary production by other groups of animals via predation, competition, or habitat modification is not well understood and has not been tested experimentally despite many studies showing how animal abundance responds to fish predators and competitors (e.g., Forrester 1994, Flecker 1996, Ruetz et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%