2018
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top‐down control by an aquatic invertebrate predator increases with temperature but does not depend on individual behavioral type

Abstract: Variation in behavioral traits among individuals within a population can have implications for food webs and ecosystems. Temperature change also alters food web structure and function, but potential interactions between warming and intraspecific behavioral variation are largely unexplored. We aimed to test how increased temperature, individual activity level of a predatory backswimmer (Anisops assimilis), and their interaction influenced the strength of top‐down control of zooplankton and phytoplankton. We use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low temperatures reduce the effects of salinity [63], biotic interactions [64] and probably their combined effects, therefore our results probably underestimate these effects because the current study was conducted during winter. To further explore patterns revealed in this experiment, the research presented here will be coupled with examination of trait-phylogeny-environment relationships to understand how traits, relatedness, and salinity may influence stream invertebrate communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Low temperatures reduce the effects of salinity [63], biotic interactions [64] and probably their combined effects, therefore our results probably underestimate these effects because the current study was conducted during winter. To further explore patterns revealed in this experiment, the research presented here will be coupled with examination of trait-phylogeny-environment relationships to understand how traits, relatedness, and salinity may influence stream invertebrate communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This bias is notable because fish tend to be absent from small and temporary water bodies whereas invertebrate predators are present in essentially all freshwater bodies. Certain invertebrate taxa such as Bythotrephes , Chaoborus , and Notonectidae have received attention, with studies showing they can have important effects on both traits and biomass of lower trophic levels ( Carpenter et al, 1992 ; Carpenter et al, 2001 ; Walsh, Lathrop & Vander Zanden, 2017 ; Ingram & Burns, 2018 ; Horppila et al, 2019 ). However, other studies have found that invertebrate predators have weak to nonexistent top-down effects, and the food web effects of many common and widespread invertebrate predators remain unknown ( e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among invasive alien species, predators tend to have the greatest impacts, compared to other functional groups, on recipient native communities, particularly in small island ecosystems where prey may experience greater predator encounter rates [ 5 , 34 ]. Moreover, there is evidence that predation pressure can interact with changes in habitat area [ 35 ] or environmental temperature [ 36 , 37 ] to modify top-down control of lower trophic levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, expected that greatly elevated predation pressure from the introduction of a voracious generalist predator ( Dalotia coriaria Kraatz, Staphylinidae) lacking a shared coevolutionary history with the microarthropod prey populations would interact with patch size [ 35 ] to reduce prey abundance or densities most severely in smaller ecosystem patches. H3: the negative effects of extreme heat-shocks, habitat loss and elevated top-down pressure from an introduced apex predator would interact synergistically [ 24 , 26 , 36 , 37 ] to compound the reductions in microarthropod abundance, densities and body size. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation