2019
DOI: 10.1145/3331651.3331655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top Challenges from the first Practical Online Controlled Experiments Summit

Abstract: Online controlled experiments (OCEs), also known as A/B tests, have become ubiquitous in evaluating the impact of changes made to software products and services. While the concept of online controlled experiments is simple, there are many practical challenges in running OCEs at scale. To understand the top practical challenges in running OCEs at scale and encourage further academic and industrial exploration, representatives with experience in large-scale experimentation from thirteen different organizations (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the same assumptions as required for the mediation case this would lead to testable restrictions, but the typical use case is a different one. As in [Athey, Chetty, Imbens, and Kang, 2016], a prominent use case is that with two samples (see also [Gupta, Kohavi, Tang, and Xu, 2019] In the surrogate case, as in the mediation case, the DAG can clarify the content of the assumptions. In particular it rules out a direct effect of the treatment on the outcome (as in Figure 7(a)).…”
Section: Mediation and Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the same assumptions as required for the mediation case this would lead to testable restrictions, but the typical use case is a different one. As in [Athey, Chetty, Imbens, and Kang, 2016], a prominent use case is that with two samples (see also [Gupta, Kohavi, Tang, and Xu, 2019] In the surrogate case, as in the mediation case, the DAG can clarify the content of the assumptions. In particular it rules out a direct effect of the treatment on the outcome (as in Figure 7(a)).…”
Section: Mediation and Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a decision maker choosing whether to implement a new policyperhaps mandating a new early childhood educational program (Krueger and Whitmore 2001;Schanzenbach 2006;Chetty et al 2011), or making micro credit available to communities in developing countries (Banerjee, Karlan, and Zinman 2015;Crépon et al 2015;Meager 2019), or changing a search algorithm for a tech company (Gomez-Uribe and Hunt 2015; Gupta et al 2019). Suppose the only unknown component of the utility of implementing the policy is the average treatment effect (the difference in the average outcome if everybody was exposed to the intervention versus the average outcome if nobody was exposed).…”
Section: Decision Making Under Uncertainty Decision Making Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There would also be a discussion regarding the credibility of the findings (especially in settings where the estimates are not based on randomized experiments), as well as their external validity and any evidence of heterogeneity. Kohavi, Henne, and Sommerfield (2007), Kohavi, Tang, and Xu (2020), and Gupta et al (2019) discuss in more detail the process of decision making in the context of randomized experiments in a business setting. Kohavi views experiments in this setting, and data-driven decision making more generally, as helping reduce the importance of what he has called the Highest Paid Person's Opinion (HIPPO) in less formal versions of these discussions.…”
Section: Decision Making Under Uncertainty Decision Making Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiment practitioners in many elds leverage the theory and conduct experiments to evaluate new ideas [7,27]. In the technology industry, experimentation is adopted by many companies [2,12,13,19,25,29]. Deployment and analysis of controlled experiments are done at large scale.…”
Section: Review On Controlled Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A/B tests (or controlled experiments, split tests) have been widely adopted in the online world as the golden rule for decision making and the driving forces for innovation. Many technology companies, such as Microsoft, Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Uber, Netix and Twitter, have in-house experimentation platforms, where experiments are run at large scale with marginal costs [2,10,12,19,25,[27][28][29]. From user-interface changes to back-end algorithms and infrastructure, from software developers to product managers to data scientists, A/B tests help make data-driven decisions and innovate new product ideas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%