2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-/bottom-soil ratios and enrichment factors: What do they really show?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Do these truly represent anthropogenic input? In a recent report, it has been shown that high EFs do not provide a reliable indication of the degree of human interference with the global environment [41]. In the report carried out in Czech Republic where five different elements were used as reference, the sequence of the EFs does not reflect the relative importance of the elements determined.…”
Section: Enrichment Factor and Index Of Geo-accumulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Do these truly represent anthropogenic input? In a recent report, it has been shown that high EFs do not provide a reliable indication of the degree of human interference with the global environment [41]. In the report carried out in Czech Republic where five different elements were used as reference, the sequence of the EFs does not reflect the relative importance of the elements determined.…”
Section: Enrichment Factor and Index Of Geo-accumulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unlike the EFs, the I geo values are generally low (< 2) in all cases. In all the soils, the six metals fall within two I geo class based on Muller's [41] interpretation; moderate contamination (Pb, Cd and Ni) and uncontaminated to moderate contamination (Cu, Cr and Zn). This contamination can only result from anthropogenic activities considered to emanate from mechanic activities.…”
Section: Geoaccumulation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical ash content in humus samples collected from visibly undisturbed forest floor was respectively for pine and spruce stands 14 and 20% (Suchara & Sucharová, 2000). The highest difference in element contents between forest floor humus and bottom mineral soil was found for Cd, S, Hg, Se and Sb (Sucharová et al, 2012). In clean areas unaffected by dust fall from extraction of local row materials forest floor may be affected by bedrock chemistry via soil-plant-soil element cycling and by bioturbation of forest floor.…”
Section: Archived Long-term Deposition Loadsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Exception is higher accumulation of rock-derived Ba, and Cs and Rb, chemical analogues of Ca and K, in forest humus. More details about forest floor humus chemistry throughout the Czech Republic are available in literature (Suchara & Sucharová, 2002;Sucharová et al, 2011;Sucharová et al, 2012).…”
Section: Archived Long-term Deposition Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%