2016
DOI: 10.1177/1745691615617439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics

Abstract: In the context of current concerns about replication in psychological science, we describe 10 findings from behavioral genetic research that have replicated robustly. These are "big" findings, both in terms of effect size and potential impact on psychological science, such as linearly increasing heritability of intelligence from infancy (20%) through adulthood (60%). Four of our top 10 findings involve the environment, discoveries that could have been found only with genetically sensitive research designs. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
387
2
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(454 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
(222 reference statements)
15
387
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…These results fit with the 'general genes hypothesis' -that the same genes often contribute to associated phenotypes (Eley 1997;Lahey and Waldman 2003;Plomin et al 2016), highlighting that genes often have pleiotropic effects. Furthermore, genetic influences contributed to a substantial amount of the phenotypic correlations both concurrently and longitudinally.…”
Section: ) Genetic and Environmental Overlap Between Diurnal Preferesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These results fit with the 'general genes hypothesis' -that the same genes often contribute to associated phenotypes (Eley 1997;Lahey and Waldman 2003;Plomin et al 2016), highlighting that genes often have pleiotropic effects. Furthermore, genetic influences contributed to a substantial amount of the phenotypic correlations both concurrently and longitudinally.…”
Section: ) Genetic and Environmental Overlap Between Diurnal Preferesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This might be one explanation why intelligence research seems to have higher power than other fields in psychology. Intelligence research is over a hundred years old and has provided several replicable findings, including the positive manifold (Van Der Maas et al, 2006) and the hierarchical structure of individual differences (McGrew, 2009), heritability of intelligence (Plomin, DeFries, Knopik, & Neiderhiser, 2016), relative stability of individual differences over the life span (Deary, Whalley, Lemmon, Crawford, & Starr, 2000), and many important results concerning the predictive power of intelligence tests in educational and socioeconomic contexts (Neisser et al, 1996;Strenze, 2007). This extensive literature has also offered many excellent measures of general intelligence and sub-domains of intelligence that show high reliabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason could be that the typical effect size in intelligence (r = .26) is slightly higher than the average effect size across the social sciences (r = .21; Richard, Bond, & Stokes-Zoota, 2003). Finally, measures in intelligence research typically have relatively high reliability, which could also explain the higher power compared to other fields (Hunt, 2010;Mackintosh, 2011;Plomin et al, 2016;Ritchie, 2015). However, even though the power in intelligence seems higher than in other fields, it is generally still much lower than the recommended 80%.…”
Section: Conclusion Impact Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within psychology and medicine there has recently been a replication crisis (Maxwell et al, 2015;Schooler, 2014;Stroebe & Strack, 2014 Plomin et al (2016) for an elaboration of each finding. Generally, these results represent important scientific knowledge about human lives, and testify as such to the value of behavior genetics and twin studies.…”
Section: Selected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%