2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03875-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toothed wheel needleless electrospinning: a versatile way to fabricate uniform and finer nanomembrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, simulations of the electric field in needleless electrospinning have revealed strong differences of the electric field near the connection line between both electrodes and farther away. Ahmad et al, e.g., showed that for a modified spinning wheel with teeth the highest electric fields were only available in a range of few cm and dropped fast outside this region [42]. Electrical field variations by approx.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, simulations of the electric field in needleless electrospinning have revealed strong differences of the electric field near the connection line between both electrodes and farther away. Ahmad et al, e.g., showed that for a modified spinning wheel with teeth the highest electric fields were only available in a range of few cm and dropped fast outside this region [42]. Electrical field variations by approx.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVP solution concentration was varied at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 wt%. The applied voltage was altered at 15,20,25,30,35, and 40 kV. The PVP solution was run at flow rates of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 ml * h −1 .…”
Section: Synthesis Of Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph shows that the higher the applied voltage, the greater the number of jets. The number of jets yielded by the wire as the applied voltage was varied by 15,20,25,30,35, and 40 kV were (0.89±0.35), (4.55±0.55), (7.72±0.86), (10.95±0.43), (11.46±0.51), and (12.06±0.48) jet * cm −1 s −1 , respectively. Similar results, which were examined using different needleless electrospinning systems, were also reported on other studies [29,32].…”
Section: Effect Of Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations