2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tooth-wear patterns in subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion and normal occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These negative values show that the differences in tooth crown heights are not entirely due to wear, but are also influenced by the normal size variation in tooth crowns. It has been shown that subjects with malocclusions have different tooth wear patterns from those with a normal occlusion [34] and it is also possible that wear is not the same on both sides of the jaw, which will tend to alter the differences between crowns sizes on the two sides and, thereby, also the directional and fluctuating asymmetry caused by variations in growth. The differences between the age groups were largest in the 45,X/46,XX females, which could conceivably originate at least in part from the lacking chromosome material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These negative values show that the differences in tooth crown heights are not entirely due to wear, but are also influenced by the normal size variation in tooth crowns. It has been shown that subjects with malocclusions have different tooth wear patterns from those with a normal occlusion [34] and it is also possible that wear is not the same on both sides of the jaw, which will tend to alter the differences between crowns sizes on the two sides and, thereby, also the directional and fluctuating asymmetry caused by variations in growth. The differences between the age groups were largest in the 45,X/46,XX females, which could conceivably originate at least in part from the lacking chromosome material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects with a normal occlusion and class II malocclusions have different tooth wear patterns [34] and the same is also assumed to apply to lateral crossbites and anterior open bite. The possible effect of age on the tooth crown heights of the three groups studied here was assessed with the t-test and when the mean ages of the 45,X and 45,X/ 46,XX females and the population controls were calculated (see Appendix, Table AIV) and the subjects were grouped into those younger than the calculated mean age or equal to/older than the mean age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Oltravari-Navarro et al 24 showed that an Angle class II division 2 condition was associated with more wear on labial surfaces of mandibular incisors, but not necessarily with more tooth wear in general. Janson et al 25 found more wear of incisors in subjects with Angle class II division 1, although maxillary and mandibular incisors may have minimal contact in these cases. To record this type of wear better, the labial surfaces need to be examined too and not only the occlusal and incisal surfaces as in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gradual attrition of the occlusal surfaces of the teeth appears to be a general physiological phenomenon in all mammals, in every civilization, and at all ages [1]. Tooth wear in malocclusion patients should not be considered pathological but rather a consequence of the different interocclusal tooth arrangement [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tooth wear in malocclusion patients should not be considered pathological but rather a consequence of the different interocclusal tooth arrangement [1]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%