2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45510-5_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools rPraat and mPraat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each labelling file was output from MAuS as a Praat textgrid. Each textgrid was compiled and edited using "rPraat" [21] adding five principle tiers (Utterance, Word, Grammatical Category, Syllable number and Phonetic Segment). All utterances were manually checked and hand corrected at a word and phonetic level using Praat [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each labelling file was output from MAuS as a Praat textgrid. Each textgrid was compiled and edited using "rPraat" [21] adding five principle tiers (Utterance, Word, Grammatical Category, Syllable number and Phonetic Segment). All utterances were manually checked and hand corrected at a word and phonetic level using Praat [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the accuracy of the segmentation by using the package rPraat 74 to read Praat TextGrid files into R 19 . The TextGrid files contain time stamps of the "true" manual segmentation with the automatic segmentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are reporting results from 292 APs. Data were extracted using the EmuR [18] and R Praat packages [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%