2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for Web Accessibility Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different approaches for evaluating the accessibility of a web page may be categorized into three categories (Abascal et al, 2019;Nuñez et al, 2019):…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The different approaches for evaluating the accessibility of a web page may be categorized into three categories (Abascal et al, 2019;Nuñez et al, 2019):…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated testing is mostly used according to Nuñez et al (2019) but does not always find all existing problems. Testing by experts is the most effective way, and user testing works most effectively to verify how people with disabilities perform specific tasks on a web page (Abascal et al, 2019;Nuñez et al, 2019). One important difference between user testing and expert evaluation is that user testing is more focused on the usability of web pages for users with disabilities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this perspective automatic evaluation of Web accessibility [ 1 ] can play a useful role. Thus, we carried out a first analysis of the currently available solutions in terms of tools, which can support stakeholders in assessing accessibility compliance, detecting barriers, supporting Web developers in knowing how to solve them and commissioners and public bodies in monitoring the accessibility over time.…”
Section: State Of the Art In Guidelines And Automatic Tools For Web Amentioning
confidence: 99%