2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for multiple granularity analysis of brain MRI data for individualized image analysis

Abstract: Voxel-based analysis is widely used for quantitative analysis of brain MRI. While this type of analysis provides the highest granularity level of spatial information (i.e., each voxel), the sheer number of voxels and noisy information from each voxel often lead to low sensitivity for detection of abnormalities. To ameliorate this issue, granularity reduction is commonly performed by applying isotropic spatial filtering. This study proposes a systematic reduction of the spatial information using ontology-based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hierarchical analysis, therefore, is important for examining the regional specificity of the findings. Our recent multi-ontology-level analysis confirmed expected results about the relationship between the precision (test-retest reproducibility) and ontology levels when they were used for automated multi-atlas brain segmentation (Djamanakova et al, 2014). As the level went up (thus, fewer defined structures and more voxel grouping), the precision went up, saturating at about 1.5% test-retest reproducibility using T1-weigthed images with 1mm resolution.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The hierarchical analysis, therefore, is important for examining the regional specificity of the findings. Our recent multi-ontology-level analysis confirmed expected results about the relationship between the precision (test-retest reproducibility) and ontology levels when they were used for automated multi-atlas brain segmentation (Djamanakova et al, 2014). As the level went up (thus, fewer defined structures and more voxel grouping), the precision went up, saturating at about 1.5% test-retest reproducibility using T1-weigthed images with 1mm resolution.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, it is of great interest to automatically select the most reliable samples, boosting up robustness of the method and its application under a clinical setting. On the other hand, many studies analyze MR images by parcellating them into several pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs) and then extracting features from each ROI (Djamanakova et al, 2014; Thung et al, 2014; Tzourio-Mazoyer et al, 2002). It is noted that PD, like many other neurodegenerative diseases, highly affects a number of brain regions (Braak et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), a fully-automated multi-atlas label-fusion method for anatomical segmentation (Tang et al 2013; Djamanakova et al 2014). The volumes of striatal structures were corrected for the total brain volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%