2003
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis

Abstract: The following resources for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis are described (http://salilab.org): MODELLER, a program for comparative modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints; MODWEB, a web server for automated comparative modeling that relies on PSI-BLAST, IMPALA and MODELLER; MODLOOP, a web server for automated loop modeling that relies on MODELLER; MOULDER, a CPU intensive protocol of MODWEB for building comparative models based on distant known structures; MODBASE, a comprehensive d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
353
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
353
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our pipeline workflow incorporates the NCBI tools platform (24), including the BLAST program for similarity searching of sequence databases. T-COFFEE (25) was used for alignment of the test sequence with the template, followed by iterations of the MODELLER-9.11 program (26) to generate the final model structure. The Chimera program (27) was used for the viewing of models and generation of images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our pipeline workflow incorporates the NCBI tools platform (24), including the BLAST program for similarity searching of sequence databases. T-COFFEE (25) was used for alignment of the test sequence with the template, followed by iterations of the MODELLER-9.11 program (26) to generate the final model structure. The Chimera program (27) was used for the viewing of models and generation of images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PALES (38) software was used to fit the measured H N -N RDCs to those back-calculated from the crystal structure of the holo-(histidine) HisJ complex (PDB 1HSL) and models of D1 and D2 built from the apo-and holo-HisJ structures. Of note, the deposited holo-HisJ structure (1HSL) contains four point mutations (N5K, S22A, E107A, and S184A) that were corrected to match the HisJ sequence from E. coli K12 (GenBank TM accession number BAA16155.1) using MODELLER (39) CSPs upon ligand binding were examined on a per residue basis using a combined chemical shift difference, where applicable, according to Mulder et al (40) for backbone atoms, where R i denotes the scaling factor of nucleus i. The scaling factors used were R N ϭ 6.4, R CЈ ϭ 3.0, R C ␣ , and R C ␤ ϭ 3.2 as shown in Equation 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure modelling of cpnSET was carried out using the virus SET structure as a template (Eswar et al, 2003;Manzur et al, 2003) and peptide docking analysis onto cpnSET was performed using AutoDock (Morris et al, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%